Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Good, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dicks-Mireaux, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Good, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dicks-Mireaux, C.

Radiology, Vol 198, 387-391, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Posterior urethral valves in male infants and newborns: detection with US of the urethra before and during voiding

CD Good, SJ Vinnicombe, IL Minty, AD King, SJ Mather and C Dicks-Mireaux
Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, England.

PURPOSE: To document the appearance and width of the posterior urethra with transperineal ultrasound (US) before and during voiding in male infants and newborns with posterior urethral valves. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with bilateral hydronephrosis underwent prospective transabdominal and transperineal US. RESULTS: Fifteen patients had proved posterior urethral valves (obstructed group); 18 patients had no obstruction (unobstructed group). In the obstructed group, the median posterior urethral width was 4.5 mm before and 10.0 mm during voiding. In the unobstructed group, the median posterior urethral width was 1.0 mm (P = .046) before and 4.0 mm (P < .001) during voiding. Bladder wall thickness was 3.0-7.6 mm (obstructed group) and 2.0-5.0 mm (unobstructed group; P < .001). With a posterior urethral diameter of at least 6 mm during voiding as a criterion for transperineal US diagnosis of obstruction, sensitivity was 100%; specificity, 89%; and positive predictive value, 88%. CONCLUSION: Transperineal voiding US is noninvasive and useful in diagnosing posterior urethral valves.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Berrocal, F. Gaya, and A. Arjonilla
Vesicoureteral Reflux: Can the Urethra Be Adequately Assessed by Using Contrast-enhanced Voiding US of the Bladder?
Radiology, January 1, 2005; 234(1): 235 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
H. Schoellnast, F. Lindbichler, and M. Riccabona
Sonographic Diagnosis of Urethral Anomalies in Infants: Value of Perineal Sonography
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2004; 23(6): 769 - 776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1996 by the Radiological Society of North America.