Radiology, Vol 198, 721-724, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Pulmonary embolism: interobserver agreement in the interpretation of conventional angiographic and DSA images in patients with nondiagnostic lung scan results

EJ van Beek, AJ Bakker and JA Reekers
Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

PURPOSE: To assess interobserver agreement in the interpretation of digital subtraction angiographic (DSA) images and conventional angiograms in patients with nondiagnostic lung scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty of 397 consecutive patients (65 men, 65 women; mean age, 57 years; age range, 18-92 years) in this prospective cohort study underwent angiography. Conventional, selective series were obtained between 1991 and 1992 in 45 patients, and intraarterial DSA series were obtained between 1992 and 1994 in 85 patients. All angiograms were read immediately by the attending radiologist, independently by two radiologists after 6 months, and later by means of consensus of the two radiologists. RESULTS: Results of the two methods were comparable. Interobserver disagreement occurred in 20%-36% (n = 9- 16) of patients with conventional images and 4%-11% (n = 3-9) of patients with DSA images. Initial diagnoses were changed after the images were reviewed by means of consensus in 20% and 12% of patients with conventional and DSA series, respectively. In 70% of these patients, initial findings were false-positive; in 25%, inconclusive; and in 5%, false-negative. CONCLUSION: Interobserver agreement is better with selective, intraarterial DSA than with conventional techniques.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. P. Kanne and T. A. Lalani Role of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism Circulation, March 30, 2004; 109(12_suppl_1): I-15 - I-21. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				L. Berlin Potential Legal Ramifications of Whole-Body CT Screening: Taking a Peek into Pandora's Box Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 317 - 322. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. P. Smith, J. M. Ryan, and B. K. Brodwater Acute Pulmonary Thromboembolism* : Comparison of the Diagnostic Capabilities of Conventional Film-Screen and Digital Angiography Chest, September 1, 2002; 122(3): 968 - 972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Tillie-Leblond, I. Mastora, F. Radenne, S. Paillard, A.-B. Tonnel, J. Remy, and M. Remy-Jardin Risk of Pulmonary Embolism after a Negative Spiral CT Angiogram in Patients with Pulmonary Disease: 1-year Clinical Follow-up Study Radiology, May 1, 2002; 223(2): 461 - 467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. J. R. van Beek, E. M. J. Brouwers, Bing Song, A. H. H. Bongaerts, and M. Oudkerk Lung Scintigraphy and Helical Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: A Meta-Analysis Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, April 1, 2001; 7(2): 87 - 92. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Guidelines on diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2000; 21(16): 1301 - 1336. [PDF]

				E. K. Yucel Pulmonary MR Angiography: Is It Ready Now? Radiology, February 1, 1999; 210(2): 301 - 303. [Full Text]

				E. J R van Beek Further studies of value of spiral computed tomography are needed BMJ, August 22, 1998; 317(7157): 540a - 540. [Full Text]

				J. F.M. Meaney, J. G. Weg, T. L. Chenevert, D. Stafford-Johnson, B. H. Hamilton, and M. R. Prince Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism with Magnetic Resonance Angiography N. Engl. J. Med., May 15, 1997; 336(20): 1422 - 1427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]