Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jamis-Dow, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Walther, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jamis-Dow, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Walther, M. M.

Radiology, Vol 198, 785-788, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Small (< or = 3-cm) renal masses: detection with CT versus US and pathologic correlation

CA Jamis-Dow, PL Choyke, SB Jennings, WM Linehan, KN Thakore and MM Walther
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1182, USA.

PURPOSE: To determine the sensitivities of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) for detection and characterization of surgically verified small renal lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease or hereditary papillary renal cancer underwent CT and US before partial nephrectomy or enucleation; 205 renal masses were removed (92% were <3 cm). Detection rates and accuracy of CT and US in the characterization of renal morphology were correlated with lesion size. RESULTS: CT and US detection rates for lesions of 0-5 mm were respectively 47% and 0%; 5-10 mm, 60% and 21%; 10-15 mm, 75% and 28%; 15-20 mm, 100% and 58%; 20-25 mm, 100% and 79%; and 25-30 mm, 100% and 100%. Among the lesions 10-35 mm, 80% and 82% were correctly characterized with CT and US, respectively. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of lesions under 1 cm were not detected with either modality. Neither CT nor US was superior in the characterization of lesions 3 cm or less. CT and particularly US screening studies in patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease should be interpreted cautiously because missed or mischaracterized small renal lesions are a frequent problem in these patients.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
D. Jandzinski, E. van Wijngaarden, V. Dogra, S. G. Fisher, A. Conde, and D. Rubens
Renal Sonography With 2-Dimensional Versus Cine Organ Imaging: Preliminary Results
J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2007; 26(5): 635 - 644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M Noroozian, R H Cohan, E M Caoili, N C Cowan, and J H Ellis
Multislice CT urography: state of the art
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2004; 77(suppl_1): S74 - S86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. M. Dahl, P. R. Mueller, and R. H. Young
Case 34-2004 - A 45-Year-Old Man with Recurrent Pain in the Right Flank and Hematuria
N. Engl. J. Med., November 11, 2004; 351(20): 2102 - 2110.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. A. Cohen and R. S. Brown
Microscopic Hematuria
N. Engl. J. Med., June 5, 2003; 348(23): 2330 - 2338.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Schmidt, C. Hohl, P. Haage, M. Blaum, D. Honnef, C. Weiss, G. Staatz, and R. W. Gunther
Diagnostic Accuracy of Phase-Inversion Tissue Harmonic Imaging Versus Fundamental B-Mode Sonography in the Evaluation of Focal Lesions of the Kidney
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2003; 180(6): 1639 - 1647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. L. Choyke, G. M. Glenn, M. M. Walther, B. Zbar, and W. M. Linehan
Hereditary Renal Cancers
Radiology, January 1, 2003; 226(1): 33 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. M. Dekker, E. J. van der Jagt, J. T. M. van Leeuwen, G. T. van der Werf, and M. G. M. Hunink
Role of Abdominal Sonography in Excluding Abdominal Malignancy in the Initial Workup of Patients with Abdominal Complaints
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2001; 177(1): 47 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
C Fowler and R H Reznek
The indeterminate renal mass
Imaging, April 1, 2001; 13(1): 27 - 43.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. J. Zagoria
Imaging of Small Renal Masses: A Medical Success Story
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 945 - 955.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Macari and M. A. Bosniak
Delayed CT to Evaluate Renal Masses Incidentally Discovered at Contrast-enhanced CT: Demonstration of Vascularity with Deenhancement
Radiology, December 1, 1999; 213(3): 674 - 680.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. G. Ali, F. V. Coakley, H. Hricak, and P. N. Bretan
Complex Posttransplantation Abnormalities of Renal Allografts: Evaluation with MR Imaging
Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 95 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. N. Low, R. C. Semelka, S. Worawattanakul, G. D. Alzate, and J. S. Sigeti
Extrahepatic Abdominal Imaging in Patients with Malignancy: Comparison of MR Imaging and Helical CT, with Subsequent Surgical Correlation
Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 625 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
A KOUKOULIS, I CIMAS, and S GÓMARA
Paraneoplastic opsoclonus associated with papillary renal cell carcinoma
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, January 1, 1998; 64(1): 137 - 138.
[Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. B. Nascimento, D. G. Mitchell, X.-M. Zhang, T. Kamishima, L. Parker, and G. A. Holland
Rapid MR Imaging Detection of Renal Cysts: Age-based Standards
Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 628 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1996 by the Radiological Society of North America.