Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by McClennan, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by McClennan, B. L.

Radiology, Vol 198, 789-793, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Angiomyolipoma and renal cell carcinoma: US differentiation

CL Siegel, WD Middleton, SA Teefey and BL McClennan
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.

PURPOSE: To analyze whether shadowing and other ultrasound (US) features were helpful for distinguishing angiomyolipoma (AML) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: US images were reviewed of 49 patients with RCC and 35 patients with AML. Each tumor was evaluated for size, location, echogenicity, homogeneity, shadowing, hypoechoic rim, and intratumoral cysts. When available, computed tomographic (CT) scans of AMLs were analyzed for the amount of fat and soft tissue in each lesion. RESULTS: AMLs tended to be smaller and more frequently echogenic than RCCs, but statistically significant overlap occurred. Shadowing was seen in 12 (33%) AMLs but was not seen in RCCs. Hypoechoic rims and intratumoral cysts were seen only in RCCs (numbers were too small to perform further statistical analysis). CONCLUSION: In hyperechoic renal masses, the presence of shadowing, a hypoechoic rim, and intratumoral cysts are important findings that may help distinguish AML from RCC.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
L. Fan, D. Lianfang, X. Jinfang, S. Yijin, and W. Ying
Diagnostic Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Solid Renal Parenchymal Lesions With Maximum Diameters of 5 cm
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2008; 27(6): 875 - 885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. R. Prasad, V. R. Surabhi, C. O. Menias, A. A. Raut, and K. N. Chintapalli
Benign Renal Neoplasms in Adults: Cross-Sectional Imaging Findings
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 158 - 164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. M. Pereira, C. B. Sirlin, P. S. Pinto, and G. Casola
CT and MR Imaging of Extrahepatic Fatty Masses of the Abdomen and Pelvis: Techniques, Diagnosis, Differential Diagnosis, and Pitfalls
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2005; 25(1): 69 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. Ascenti, M. Gaeta, C. Magno, S. Mazziotti, A. Blandino, D. Melloni, and G. Zimbaro
Contrast-Enhanced Second-Harmonic Sonography in the Detection of Pseudocapsule in Renal Cell Carcinoma
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2004; 182(6): 1525 - 1530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Schmidt, C. Hohl, P. Haage, M. Blaum, D. Honnef, C. Weiss, G. Staatz, and R. W. Gunther
Diagnostic Accuracy of Phase-Inversion Tissue Harmonic Imaging Versus Fundamental B-Mode Sonography in the Evaluation of Focal Lesions of the Kidney
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2003; 180(6): 1639 - 1647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
Z. V. Maizlin, P. Gottlieb, Y. Corat-Simon, and S. Strauss
Various Appearances of Multiple Angiomyolipomas in the Same Kidney in a Patient Without Tuberous Sclerosis
J. Ultrasound Med., February 1, 2002; 21(2): 211 - 213.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1996 by the Radiological Society of North America.