Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gurney, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gurney, J.

Radiology, Vol 199, 117-122, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Missed lung cancer at CT: imaging findings in nine patients

JW Gurney
Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Omaha, NE 68198-1045, USA.

PURPOSE: To assess the imaging findings and course of lung cancers missed on computed tomographic (CT) scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of CT scans was performed on nine patients who underwent CT examination for various clinical indications and in whom a lung cancer had been missed. Subspecialty chest radiologists determined whether retrospectively identified lesions were missed due to observer error or technical failure. RESULTS: Five missed tumors were peripheral and four were central in location. All peripheral tumors were less than 3 mm in diameter. The interval from initial examination to detection of peripheral tumors ranged from 8 to 95 months. This interval for central tumors was shorter (3-14 months). Estimated doubling times ranged from 24 to 285 days. CONCLUSION: Small lung cancers that are near the threshold for detectability may be missed at CT. Such failure of detection is attributable primarily to the poor conspicuity of lesions. Retrospective identification at CT raises medicolegal issues.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Das, G. Muhlenbruch, A. H. Mahnken, T. G. Flohr, L. Gundel, S. Stanzel, T. Kraus, R. W. Gunther, and J. E. Wildberger
Small Pulmonary Nodules: Effect of Two Computer-aided Detection Systems on Radiologist Performance.
Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 564 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. Li, H. Arimura, K. Suzuki, J. Shiraishi, Q. Li, H. Abe, R. Engelmann, S. Sone, H. MacMahon, and K. Doi
Computer-aided Detection of Peripheral Lung Cancers Missed at CT: ROC Analyses without and with Localization
Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 684 - 690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
K. Peldschus, P. Herzog, S. A. Wood, J. I. Cheema, P. Costello, and U. J. Schoepf
Computer-Aided Diagnosis as a Second Reader: Spectrum of Findings in CT Studies of the Chest Interpreted as Normal
Chest, September 1, 2005; 128(3): 1517 - 1523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. D. Rubin, J. K. Lyo, D. S. Paik, A. J. Sherbondy, L. C. Chow, A. N. Leung, R. Mindelzun, P. K. Schraedley-Desmond, S. E. Zinck, D. P. Naidich, et al.
Pulmonary Nodules on Multi-Detector Row CT Scans: Performance Comparison of Radiologists and Computer-aided Detection
Radiology, January 1, 2005; 234(1): 274 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Armato III, G. McLennan, M. F. McNitt-Gray, C. R. Meyer, D. Yankelevitz, D. R. Aberle, C. I. Henschke, E. A. Hoffman, E. A. Kazerooni, H. MacMahon, et al.
Lung Image Database Consortium: Developing a Resource for the Medical Imaging Research Community
Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 739 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. K. Shah, J. H. M. Austin, C. S. White, P. Patel, L. B. Haramati, G. D. N. Pearson, M. C. Shiau, and Y. M. Berkmen
Missed Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Radiographic Findings of Potentially Resectable Lesions Evident Only in Retrospect
Radiology, January 1, 2003; 226(1): 235 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. Li, S. Sone, H. Abe, H. MacMahon, S. G. Armato III, and K. Doi
Lung Cancers Missed at Low-Dose Helical CT Screening in a General Population: Comparison of Clinical, Histopathologic, and Imaging Findings
Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 673 - 683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
J R C Ellis and F V Gleeson
Lung cancer screening
Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2001; 74(882): 478 - 485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Kakinuma, H. Ohmatsu, M. Kaneko, K. Eguchi, T. Naruke, K. Nagai, Y. Nishiwaki, A. Suzuki, and N. Moriyama
Detection Failures in Spiral CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Analysis of CT Findings
Radiology, June 1, 1999; 212(1): 61 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1996 by the Radiological Society of North America.