Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rubens, D.
Right arrow Articles by Frank, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rubens, D.
Right arrow Articles by Frank, I.

Radiology, Vol 199, 159-163, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Clinical evaluation of prostate biopsy parameters: gland volume and elevated prostate-specific antigen level

DJ Rubens, RH Gottlieb, CE Maldonado Jr and IN Frank
Department of Radiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, New York, NY 14642-8648, USA.

PURPOSE: To determine whether excess prostate-specific antigen (PSA) improves the accuracy of predicting positive biopsy results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Results of prostate biopsy in 130 consecutive patients were correlated with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) findings, digital rectal examination results, serum PSA level, and excess PSA (serum PSA level minus predicted PSA level [prostate volume x 0.12]), alone and in combination. Random sextant biopsy was performed in all patients, as well as directed biopsy of any suspicious lesion seen at TRUS. RESULTS: Excess PSA alone was most accurate in the prediction of positive biopsy results. Use of an excess PSA of > or = 0 ng/mL instead of a serum PSA level of > 4 ng/mL to initiate prostate biopsy increased the positive yield from 49% to 56% and accuracy from 51% to 62%, eliminating 21% of biopsies while maintaining sensitivity at 94% (vs 95% with serum PSA level). CONCLUSION: Use of only excess PSA of > or = 0 ng/mL to initiate prostate biopsy results in the best combination of sensitivity and specificity compared with the other standard parameters.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. S. Taylor, D. J. Rubens, B. C. Porter, Z. Wu, R. B. Baggs, P. A. di Sant'Agnese, G. Nadasdy, D. Pasternack, E. M. Messing, P. Nigwekar, et al.
Prostate Cancer: Three-dimensional Sonoelastography for in Vitro Detection
Radiology, December 1, 2005; 237(3): 981 - 985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. Kuligowska, M. A. Barish, H. M. Fenlon, and M. Blake
Predictors of Prostate Carcinoma: Accuracy of Gray-Scale and Color Doppler US and Serum Markers
Radiology, September 1, 2001; 220(3): 757 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1996 by the Radiological Society of North America.