Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keogan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Carroll, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keogan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Carroll, B.

Radiology, Vol 199, 165-169, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Renal resistive indexes: variability in Doppler US measurement in a healthy population

MT Keogan, MA Kliewer, BS Hertzberg, DM DeLong, RH Tupler and BA Carroll
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

PURPOSE: To determine the variability in resistive index (RI) in normal kidneys, possible causes of variability, and consequences of reporting a single value. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Doppler ultrasound RI measurements were obtained in the upper, middle, and lower regions of 118 kidneys in 58 healthy subjects (aged 24-70 years; 35 women, 23 men) who subsequently underwent angiography. The effects of sampling a particular parenchymal region, vascular territory, or kidney were assessed. RESULTS: Kidney region, vascular territory, and right versus left kidney had no consistently significant effect (P < or = .05) on RI. Age had a statistically significant effect. RI readings were highly correlated with each other both within a subject and within a kidney. The probability that a single RI value would exceed 0.70 in a healthy 45-year-old subject was 6%; this decreased to 3% when three readings were averaged. CONCLUSION: The variability of RI measurements in a kidney suggests that a number of RI readings should be averaged before a single representative value is reported.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. E. Tublin, R. O. Bude, and J. F. Platt
The Resistive Index in Renal Doppler Sonography: Where Do We Stand?
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 885 - 892.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
K. S. Aikimbaev, A. Canataroglu, S. Ozbek, and A. Usal
Renal Vascular Resistance in Progressive Systemic Sclerosis: Evaluation with Duplex Doppler Ultrasound
Angiology, October 1, 2001; 52(10): 697 - 701.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1996 by the Radiological Society of North America.