Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Getz, J.
Right arrow Articles by Obuchowski, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Getz, J.
Right arrow Articles by Obuchowski, N.

Radiology, Vol 199, 737-742, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Acromial morphology: relation to sex, age, symmetry, and subacromial enthesophytes

JD Getz, MP Recht, DW Piraino, JP Schils, BM Latimer, LM Jellema and NA Obuchowski
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH 44195, USA.

PURPOSE: To evaluate acromial shape in relation to age, sex, symmetry, and presence of subacromial enthesophytes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred ninety-four cadaveric scapulas were reviewed. Specimens were categorized by sex and age (age range, 20-89 years). Acromial morphology was typed according to the Bigliani classification: type I, flat; type II, curved; and type III, hooked. The presence and degree of subacromial enthesopathy was recorded. Selective radiographic correlation was obtained. RESULTS: The relative percentages of acromial types I, II, and III were 22.8% (90 acromions), 68.5% (270 acromions), and 8.6% (34 acromions), respectively. There was a greater percentage of type III in men (10.2% [21 of 205] vs 6.9% [13 of 189] and type I in women (27.5% [52 of 189] vs 18.5% [38 of 205]). There was no relationship between acromial type and age (P = .667). Enthesophytes were most common in type III (20 [59%] of 34 acromions) versus type II (115 [42.6%] of 270 acromions) and type I (22 [24%] of 90 acromions). Acromial morphology was symmetric in 135 (70.7%) of 191 pairs of acromions and asymmetric in 56 pairs (29.3%). CONCLUSION: Acromial shape does not vary significantly with age. It does, however, differ between sexes. The relative percentages of the types differ from previously reported values. Acromial shape tends to be symmetric. A trend between acromial type and the presence of enthesophytes is observed.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1996 by the Radiological Society of North America.