Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blake, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blake, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, C.

Radiology, Vol 199, 767-772, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Sacral plexus: optimal imaging planes for MR assessment

LC Blake, WD Robertson and CE Hayes
Department of Radiology, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle 98195, USA.

PURPOSE: To identify the optimal imaging planes for magnetic resonance (MR) evaluation of the sacral plexus (SP) and proximal sciatic nerve (SN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The SPs of 10 health adult volunteers were prospectively studied with T1-weighted MR imaging with custom-built pelvic phased-array coils. The conspicuity of 12 anatomic characteristics (comprising the SP and their relationship to normal pelvic anatomy) on a series of coronal, axial, and oblique images was graded. Results were evaluated with the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. RESULTS: At least two planes were necessary to assess the anatomy of the SP and SN. Analysis of average conspicuity scores showed that the direct coronal and direct axial planes were the best overall and were superior to other imaging planes in the demonstration of the L-4 and L-5 ventral rami, the lumbosacral trunk, the S-1 contribution to the SN, and the SN in the greater sciatic foramen. The sacral coronal plane was best for the visualization of the bony sacrum, sacral foramina, and proximal S-1 to S-4 nerve roots. The remaining imaging planes had limited utility. CONCLUSION: MR imaging with a combination of direct coronal and direct axial planes enables thorough evaluation of all components of the SP and proximal SN.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
Z.W. Zhang, L.J. Song, Q.F. Meng, Z.P. Li, B.N. Luo, Y.H. Yang, and Z. Pei
High-Resolution Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging of the Human Lumbosacral Plexus and Its Branches Based on a Steady-State Free Precession Imaging Technique at 3T
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2008; 29(6): 1092 - 1094.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadioGraphicsHome page
J. Diel, O. Ortiz, R. A. Losada, D. B. Price, M. W. Hayt, and D. S. Katz
The Sacrum: Pathologic Spectrum, Multimodality Imaging, and Subspecialty Approach
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2001; 21(1): 83 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1996 by the Radiological Society of North America.