Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bankier, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hubsch, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bankier, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hubsch, P

Radiology, Vol 199, 831-836, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Bronchial wall thickness: appropriate window settings for thin-section CT and radiologic-anatomic correlation

AA Bankier, D Fleischmann, R Mallek, A Windisch, FW Winkelbauer, M Kontrus, L Havelec, CJ Herold and P Hubsch
Department of Radiology, University of Vienna, Austria.

PURPOSE: To analyze the influence of computed tomographic (CT) window settings on bronchial wall thickness and to define appropriate window settings for its evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three inflation- fixed lungs were scanned with a section thickness of 1.5 mm by using a high-spatial-frequency algorithm. Wall thickness in 10 bronchial specimens was measured with planimetry. Window centers were altered in a range of -200 to -900 HU and window widths in a range of 400-1,500 HU. Relative and absolute differences between CT and planimetric values were calculated. CT and planimetric measures were correlated. Inter- and intraobserver variabilities were determined. RESULTS: Window widths less than 1,000 HU resulted in a substantial overestimation of bronchial wall thickness, whereas widths greater than 1,400 HU resulted in an underestimation of bronchial wall thickness. There was no interaction between "width" and "center" regarding their influence on bronchial walls (F = 0.23; P = .99). Correlation between CT and planimetry was statistically significant (r = .85; P = .0001). Differences between the two observers were not statistically significant; results of the measurements of the two observers correlated well (r = .97; P = .001). CONCLUSION: Bronchial wall thickness on thin-section CT scans should be evaluated with window centers between -250 and -700 HU and with window widths greater than 1,000 HU. Other than window settings, notably window widths less than 1,000 HU, can lead to substantial artificial thickening of bronchial walls.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
D. G. Parr, P. G. Guest, J. H. Reynolds, L. J. Dowson, and R. A. Stockley
Prevalence and Impact of Bronchiectasis in {alpha}1-Antitrypsin Deficiency
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 15, 2007; 176(12): 1215 - 1221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
J. R. Dame Carroll, A. Chandra, A. S. Jones, N. Berend, J. S. Magnussen, and G. G. King
Airway dimensions measured from micro-computed tomography and high-resolution computed tomography
Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2006; 28(4): 712 - 720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
P. A. de Jong, N. L. Muller, P. D. Pare, and H. O. Coxson
Computed tomographic imaging of the airways: relationship to structure and function
Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2005; 26(1): 140 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Matsuoka, Y. Kurihara, Y. Nakajima, H. Niimi, H. Ashida, and K. Kaneoya
Serial Change in Airway Lumen and Wall Thickness at Thin-Section CT in Asymptomatic Subjects
Radiology, February 1, 2005; 234(2): 595 - 603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
N L Muller and H Coxson
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease * 4: Imaging the lungs in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Thorax, November 1, 2002; 57(11): 982 - 985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
S A Little, M W Sproule, M D Cowan, K J Macleod, M Robertson, J G Love, G W Chalmers, C P McSharry, and N C Thomson
High resolution computed tomographic assessment of airway wall thickness in chronic asthma: reproducibility and relationship with lung function and severity
Thorax, March 1, 2002; 57(3): 247 - 253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
D.M. Hansell
Small airways diseases: detection and insights with computed tomography
Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2001; 17(6): 1294 - 1313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
G. G. KING, N. L. MÜLLER, K. P. WHITTALL, Q.-S. XIANG, and P. D. PARÉ
An Analysis Algorithm for Measuring Airway Lumen and Wall Areas from High-Resolution Computed Tomographic Data
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 1, 2000; 161(2): 574 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
G. G. KING, N. L. MÜLLER, and P. D. PARÉ
Evaluation of Airways in Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Using High-Resolution Computed Tomography
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 1999; 159(3): 992 - 1004.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1996 by the Radiological Society of North America.