Radiology, Vol 199, 837-841, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Pulmonary nodules: effect on detection of spiral CT pitch

AR Wright, DA Collie, JR Williams, B Hashemi-Malayeri, AJ Stevenson and CM Turnbull
Department of Radiology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland.

PURPOSE: To compare spiral computed tomography (CT) performed at increased pitch with spiral CT performed at standard pitch in the detection of pulmonary nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Spiral CT scanning of the thorax was performed with a pitch of 1.0 in 109 patients with pulmonary nodules due to metastases. The patients were also randomly assigned to undergo further scanning with a pitch of 1.2 (n = 34), 1.5 (n = 37), 2.0 (n = 38) at the same scanning session. The scan pairs were analysed for number, size, and distribution of nodules. RESULTS: A bias toward undercounting was noted on scans with a pitch of 1.5 and 2.0; however, this was not statistically significant. Correlation coefficients were r = .982, r = .977, and r = .989 for scans of pitch 1.2, 1.5, and 2.0, respectively. Disease in one patient would have been prospectively understaged from findings on a scan of pitch 2.0 because of poor conspicuity of a small solitary nodule. CONCLUSION: Findings from scans with increased pitch generally agree well with those from scans with standard pitch; however, there is a greater risk of understaging of disease in patients with solitary nodules as pitch increases. Pitch should be limited to no greater than 1.5 for initial staging of pulmonary metastatic disease.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. K. Leader, T. E. Warfel, C. R. Fuhrman, S. K. Golla, J. L. Weissfeld, R. S. Avila, W. D. Turner, and B. Zheng Pulmonary Nodule Detection with Low-Dose CT of the Lung: Agreement Among Radiologists Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 973 - 978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L M Moran, R Rodriguez, A Calzado, A Turrero, A Arenas, A Cuevas, B Garcia-Castano, N Gomez, and P Moran Image quality and dose evaluation in spiral chest CT examinations of patients with lung carcinoma Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2004; 77(922): 839 - 846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. F. Gruden, S. Ouanounou, S. Tigges, S. D. Norris, and T. S. Klausner Incremental Benefit of Maximum-Intensity-Projection Images on Observer Detection of Small Pulmonary Nodules Revealed by Multidetector CT Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2002; 179(1): 149 - 157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Harvey, T. R. Geldart, R. Duell, G. M. Mead, and K. Tung Routine computerised tomographic scans of the thorax in surveillance of stage I testicular non-seminomatous germ-cell cancer--a necessary risk? Ann. Onc., February 20, 2002; 13(2): 237 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Paterson, D. P. Frush, and L. F. Donnelly Helical CT of the Body: Are Settings Adjusted for Pediatric Patients? Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 297 - 301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Kakinuma, H. Ohmatsu, M. Kaneko, K. Eguchi, T. Naruke, K. Nagai, Y. Nishiwaki, A. Suzuki, and N. Moriyama Detection Failures in Spiral CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Analysis of CT Findings Radiology, June 1, 1999; 212(1): 61 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text]