|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 200, 105-110, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
SM Ascher, JC Johnson, WA Barnes, CJ Bae, RH Patt and RK Zeman
Department of Radiology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
PURPOSE: To describe the spin-echo and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging appearance of the uterus in women receiving tamoxifen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five postmenopausal women with breast carcinoma receiving tamoxifen therapy underwent pelvic MR imaging. T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and dynamic gradient-echo T1-weighted sequences were used. Twenty-seven patients underwent uterine sampling within 3 months of MR imaging. RESULTS: Endometrial width on T2-weighted images ranged from 0.1 to 7.5 cm (mean thickness, 1.1 cm). Two uterine imaging patterns were noted. Patients with pattern 1 findings had homogeneous high signal intensity of the endometrium on T2-weighted images (mean, 0.5 cm) and enhancement of the endometrial- myometrial interface and a signal void in the lumen on gadolinium- enhanced images (18 patients). Patients with pattern 2 findings had heterogeneous endometrial signal intensity on T2-weighted images (mean, 1.8 cm) with enhancement of the endometrial-myometrial interface and latticelike enhancement traversing the endometrial canal on gadolinium- enhanced images (17 patients). Other imaging findings included subendometrial cysts, nabothian cysts, leiomyoma, and adenomyosis. Ten patients with pattern 1 findings had atrophic or proliferative endometria at histopathologic analysis; 12 of the 17 patients with pattern 2 findings had polyps, one of which had a focus of endometrial carcinoma. CONCLUSION: MR imaging of the uterus showed two distinct patterns in women receiving tamoxifen therapy.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Chourmouzi, G. Boulogianni, T. Zarampoukas, and A. Drevelengas Sonography and MRI of Tamoxifen-Associated Mullerian Adenosarcoma of the Uterus Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2003; 181(6): 1673 - 1675. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Nalaboff, J. S. Pellerito, and E. Ben-Levi Imaging the Endometrium: Disease and Normal Variants RadioGraphics, November 1, 2001; 21(6): 1409 - 1424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Ascher, I. Imaoka, and J. M. Lage Tamoxifen-induced Uterine Abnormalities: The Role of Imaging1 Radiology, January 1, 2000; 214(1): 29 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Grasel, E. K. Outwater, E. S. Siegelman, D. Capuzzi, L. Parker, and S. M. Hussain Endometrial Polyps: MR Imaging Features and Distinction from Endometrial Carcinoma1 Radiology, January 1, 2000; 214(1): 47 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |