|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 200, 111-117, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
C Martinoli, G Crespi, M Bertolotto, GA Rollandi, I Rosenberg, F Pretolesi and LE Derchi
Istituto di Radiologia-Universita di Genova, Italy.
PURPOSE: To evaluate, with power Doppler (PD) ultrasound (US), the normal interlobular vasculature in patients who underwent renal transplantation and to assess if defects of the PD signal at the interlobular level correspond to cortical areas that lack blood perfusion at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two normal and 33 malfunctioning transplanted kidneys were studied with PD US (6.5 MHz). PD images of interlobular vessels were graded on a scale of normal (pattern I) and decreasing visualization. In kidneys with focal (pattern II) and diffuse (pattern III) absence of interlobular signal, correlative dynamic MR imaging was performed. RESULTS: Interlobular vessels were consistently depicted with PD US in the proximal cortex of normally functioning transplanted kidneys. Of kidneys with a pattern II appearance, five had no contrast material enhancement in the cortical sites in which the interlobular PD signal was detected and three were contrast enhanced but it was less intense than that in adjacent cortical sites with normal interlobular vasculature. All transplanted kidneys with a pattern III appearance had delayed contrast enhancement. CONCLUSIONS: Although PD US appears to depict the interlobular vasculature up to the renal capsule, care should be taken in the diagnosis of perfusion defects, since absence of detectable flow at the interlobular level does not always correspond to cortical areas that lack perfusion on MR images.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. I. Bluth, J. H. Sunshine, J. B. Lyons, C. A. Beam, L. A. Troxclair, L. Althans-Kopecky, P. E. Crewson, M. A. Sullivan, D. H. Smetherman, P. A. Heidenreich, et al. Power Doppler Imaging: Initial Evaluation as a Screening Examination for Carotid Artery Stenosis Radiology, June 1, 2000; 215(3): 791 - 800. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |