|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 200, 165-168, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
VP van der Hulst, J van Baalen, LS Kool, JH van Bockel, AR van Erkel, J Ilgun and PM Pattynama
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Leiden University Hospital, The Netherlands.
PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of proximal and peripheral Doppler parameters for detection of renal artery stenosis (RAS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors obtained absolute velocities and peripheral Doppler waveforms in 16 stenotic and 14 normal renal arteries by using a 0.45-mm endovascular flow wire. Hemodynamically significant stenosis was established by measuring transstenotic invasive pressure gradients, with a 10 mm Hg or greater pressure drop indicating RAS. Accuracy of the Doppler parameters and of digital subtraction angiographic (DSA) results were compared by using receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Measurements of absolute velocities at the site of the stenosis (maximal peak systolic velocity [PSVmax], PSV ratio, renal artery-to-aortic PVS ratio) showed high accuracy for diagnosis of RAS similar to that of DSA (areas under the ROC curve were 0.96, 0.97, 0.93, respectively). The distal intrarenal Doppler indexes (notably loss of early systolic peak, acceleration, acceleration time, pulsatility index, and resistive index) did not show statistically significant correlation with RAS. CONCLUSION: Doppler measurements in the main renal artery correlate well with RAS. The intrarenal Doppler spectrum, however, has no diagnostic value. The authors conclude that duplex Doppler US is not a suitable screening test for RAS.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.-C. Li, L. Wang, Y.-X. Jiang, Q. Dai, S. Cai, K. Lv, and Z.-H. Qi Evaluation of Renal Artery Stenosis With Velocity Parameters of Doppler Sonography J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2006; 25(6): 735 - 742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Gross, J. Kramer, O. Weingartner, F. Uhlich, F. C. Luft, J. Waigand, and R. Dietz Determination of Renal Arterial Stenosis Severity: Comparison of Pressure Gradient and Vessel Diameter Radiology, September 1, 2001; 220(3): 751 - 756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Sarkar, D. N. Siegel, G. Soulez, and V. L. Oliva Invited Commentary Authors' Response RadioGraphics, September 1, 2000; 20(5): 1368 - 1372. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Claudon, P. F. Plouin, G. M. Baxter, T. Rohban, and D. M. Devos Renal Arteries in Patients at Risk of Renal Arterial Stenosis: Multicenter Evaluation of the Echo-enhancer SH U 508A at Color and Spectral Doppler US Radiology, March 1, 2000; 214(3): 739 - 746. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
V. S. Lee, N. M. Rofsky, A. T. Ton, G. Johnson, G. A. Krinsky, and J. C. Weinreb Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor-Enhanced Phase-Contrast MR Imaging to Measure Renal Artery Velocity Waveforms in Patients with Suspected Renovascular Hypertension Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2000; 174(2): 499 - 508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. O. Bude, R. G. Larson, W. W. Nichols, and J. M. Rubin Stenosis of the Main Artery Supplying an Organ: Effect of End-Organ Vascular Resistance on the Poststenotic Peak Systolic Velocity in an in Vitro Hydraulic Model at Doppler US Radiology, July 1, 1999; 212(1): 79 - 87. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. S. Malatino, G. Polizzi, M. Garozzo, F. Rapisarda, P. Fatuzzo, I. Bellanuova, A. Cataliotti, A. Brozzetti, S. Neri, P. A. Malfa, et al. Diagnosis of Renovascular Disease by Extra- and Intrarenal Doppler Parameters Angiology, October 1, 1998; 49(10): 707 - 721. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |