|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 200, 341-347, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
M Bhalla, DP Naidich, G McGuinness, JF Gruden, BS Leitman and DI McCauley
Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center, NY 10016, USA.
PURPOSE: To evaluate assessment of diffuse lung disease with helical computed tomography (CT) and maximum intensity projection (MIP) and minimum intensity projection images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six patients with suspected lung disease (the control group) and 20 patients with documented disease underwent axial helical CT through the upper and lower lung fields. Findings on the MIP and minimum intensity projection images of each helical data set were compared with findings on the thin-section scan obtained at the midplane of the series. RESULTS: Owing to markedly improved visualization of peripheral pulmonary vessels (n = 26) and improved spatial orientation, MIP images were superior to helical scans to help identify pulmonary nodules and characterize them as peribronchovascular (n = 2) or centrilobular (n = 7). Minimum intensity projection images were more accurate than thin- section scans to help identify lumina of central airways (n = 23) and define abnormal low (n = 15) and high (ground-glass) (n = 8) lung attenuation. Conventional thin-section scans depicted fine linear structures more clearly than either MIP or minimum intensity projection images, including the walls of peripheral, dilated airways (n = 3) and interlobular septa (n = 3). MIP and minimum intensity projection images added additional diagnostic findings to those on thin-section scans in 13 (65%) of 20 cases. CONCLUSION: MIP and minimum intensity projection images of helical data sets may help diagnosis of a wide spectrum of diffuse lung diseases.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. J. Friedman Imaging Studies in Emphysema Proceedings of the ATS, May 1, 2008; 5(4): 494 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Beigelman-Aubry, C. Hill, A. Guibal, J. Savatovsky, and P. A. Grenier Multi-Detector Row CT and Postprocessing Techniques in the Assessment of Diffuse Lung Disease RadioGraphics, November 1, 2005; 25(6): 1639 - 1652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Kim, J. H. Kim, S.-J. Bae, and K.-S. Cho CT Angiography for Evaluation of Living Renal Donors: Comparison of Four Reconstruction Methods Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2004; 183(2): 471 - 477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Gruden, S. Ouanounou, S. Tigges, S. D. Norris, and T. S. Klausner Incremental Benefit of Maximum-Intensity-Projection Images on Observer Detection of Small Pulmonary Nodules Revealed by Multidetector CT Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2002; 179(1): 149 - 157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.R. Ferretti, I. Bricault, and M. Coulomb Virtual tools for imaging of the thorax Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2001; 18(2): 381 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.M. Hansell Small airways diseases: detection and insights with computed tomography Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2001; 17(6): 1294 - 1313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Endo, F. Murayama, T. Hasegawa, Y. Sohara, and K. Fuse Helical computed tomographic minimum-intensity projection of a slit in an airway obstruction Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 1999; 67(3): 847 - 849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |