Radiology, Vol 200, 509-517, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Imaging of osseous and cartilaginous intraarticular bodies in the knee: comparison of MR imaging and MR arthrography with CT and CT arthrography in cadavers

J Brossmann, KW Preidler, B Daenen, RA Pedowitz, R Andresen, P Clopton, D Trudell, M Pathria and D Resnick
Department of Radiology, Veterans Administration Medical Center, San Diego, CA 92161, USA.

PURPOSE: To compare magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR arthrography with computed tomography (CT) and CT arthrography in the detection of intraarticular bodies in the knee. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cuboid (3- or 6-mm-long sides) osseous and cartilaginous bodies were implanted in 16 cadaveric knee specimens. MR imaging was performed with T1-weighted spin-echo (SE), T2-weighted SE, proton-density-weighted SE, gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state (GRASS), and spoiled GRASS sequences. MR arthrography was performed in two phases with saline and 2 mmol/L gadopentetate dimeglumine. CT and CT arthrography were performed in the transaxial plane. RESULTS: MR arthrography yielded the highest accuracy for the detection of osseous and cartilaginous bodies combined (92%) and was significantly (P < .01) better than MR imaging (57%-70%), CT arthrography (80%), and CT (74%). Accuracy of CT arthrography was significantly better than that of MR imaging and that of CT. Accuracy of saline-enhanced MR arthrography was significantly inferior (P < .001) to that of gadolinium-enhanced MR arthrography. CONCLUSION: MR arthrography is the best imaging technique for detection of individual intraarticular bodies. CT arthrography is the second most accurate method. Spoiled GRASS and T2-weighted SE sequences are the most accurate at MR imaging. The presence of intraarticular fluid and performance of saline-enhanced MR arthrography improve detectability of intraarticular bodies.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. R. McCauley MR Imaging Evaluation of the Postoperative Knee Radiology, January 1, 2005; 234(1): 53 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. R. Knuesel, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, H. P. Noetzli, C. Dora, M. Zanetti, J. Hodler, B. Kuehn, and M. R. Schmid MR Arthrography of the Hip: Diagnostic Performance of a Dedicated Water-Excitation 3D Double-Echo Steady-State Sequence to Detect Cartilage Lesions Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2004; 183(6): 1729 - 1735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Magee, M. Shapiro, G. Hewell, and D. Williams Complications of Rotator Cuff Surgery in Which Bioabsorbable Anchors Are Used Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2003; 181(5): 1227 - 1231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. S. Steinbach, W. E. Palmer, and M. E. Schweitzer Special Focus Session: MR Arthrography RadioGraphics, September 1, 2002; 22(5): 1223 - 1246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Robinson, L. M. White, D. C. Salonen, T. R. Daniels, and D. Ogilvie-Harris Anterolateral Ankle Impingement: MR Arthrographic Assessment of the Anterolateral Recess Radiology, October 1, 2001; 221(1): 186 - 190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. R. McCauley and D. G. Disler Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Articular Cartilage of the Knee J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., January 1, 2001; 9(1): 2 - 8. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]