Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herts, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Einstein, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herts, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Einstein, D. M.

Radiology, Vol 200, 731-735, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Power injection of intravenous contrast material through central venous catheters for CT: in vitro evaluation

BR Herts, MA Cohen, B McInroy, WJ Davros, RC Zepp and DM Einstein
Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH 44195, USA.

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of use of a power injector to deliver contrast material through central venous catheters for computed tomographic (CT) examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ioversol 240 and iothalamate meglumine 43% were separately injected through three 9.6-F Hickman catheters and three 10.0-F Leonard catheters with a power injector in an in vitro study. Flow rates of 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 mL/sec were tested. Peak pressures were mechanically recorded from two sites. A 95% prediction interval was calculated for each peak pressure, and the upper limits at the prediction interval were evaluated to determine if it was less than the recommended limit of 25 psi (175 kPa). RESULTS: Contrast medium, flow rate, and catheter type each statistically significantly affected the measured peak pressures (P = .0001). For each flow rate tested, the upper limits of the prediction interval for the peak pressure at the connection between the coiled tubing and the catheter were below the manufacturer's specified peak pressure. CONCLUSION: In vitro analysis demonstrates that power injection of intravenous contrast medium through central venous catheters does not exceed the pressure limits of these catheters at the flow rates tested. In vivo testing to evaluate the safety and efficacy of power injection through central venous catheters is necessary.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. F. Donnelly, J. Dickerson, and J. M. Racadio
Is Hand Injection of Central Venous Catheters for Contrast-Enhanced CT Safe in Children?
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1530 - 1532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. K. Rigsby, E. Gasber, R. Seshadri, C. Sullivan, M. Wyers, and T. Ben-Ami
Safety and Efficacy of Pressure-Limited Power Injection of Iodinated Contrast Medium Through Central Lines in Children
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): 726 - 732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
P O'Sullivan, M Brown, B Hartnett, and J R Mayo
Central line pump infusion and large volume mediastinal contrast extravasation in CT
Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2006; 79(944): e75 - e77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. C. Sanelli, M. Deshmukh, I. Ougorets, R. Caiati, and L. A. Heier
Safety and Feasibility of Using a Central Venous Catheter for Rapid Contrast Injection Rates
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2004; 183(6): 1829 - 1834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. R. Herts, C. M. O'Malley, S. L. Wirth, M. L. Lieber, and B. Pohlman
Power Injection of Contrast Media Using Central Venous Catheters: Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 447 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1996 by the Radiological Society of North America.