Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bach, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Blumgart, L. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bach, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Blumgart, L. H.

Radiology, Vol 201, 149-154, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Portal vein evaluation with US: comparison to angiography combined with CT arterial portography

AM Bach, LE Hann, KT Brown, GI Getrajdman, SK Herman, Y Fong and LH Blumgart
Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.

PURPOSE: To compare ultrasound (US) to angiography combined with computed tomography during arterial portography (CTAP) in the preoperative evaluation of the portal vein. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-three consecutive patients being considered for hepatic resection underwent color and spectral Doppler US and angiography with CTAP before surgery. The main, right, and left portal veins were evaluated separately. A total of 187 veins were assessed for encasement, occlusion, or thrombosis. RESULTS: At surgery, 41 portal veins were abnormal. US allowed detection of 38 of 41 (93%) involved portal veins with 93% sensitivity, 99% specificity, 97% positive predictive value, and 98% negative predictive value. Angiography with CTAP allowed diagnosis of 37 of 41 (90%) involved portal veins with 90% sensitivity, 99% specificity, 95% positive predictive value, and 97% negative predictive value. CONCLUSION: US is comparable to angiography combined with CTAP in evaluation of the portal vein.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Arch SurgHome page
K. M. Stamou, K. G. Toutouzas, P. B. Kekis, S. Nakos, A. Gafou, A. Manouras, E. Krespis, S. Katsaragakis, and J. Bramis
Prospective Study of the Incidence and Risk Factors of Postsplenectomy Thrombosis of the Portal, Mesenteric, and Splenic Veins
Arch Surg, July 1, 2006; 141(7): 663 - 669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1996 by the Radiological Society of North America.