Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cardinal, E.
Right arrow Articles by Pelletier, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cardinal, E.
Right arrow Articles by Pelletier, M.

Radiology, Vol 201, 257-259, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Plantar fasciitis: sonographic evaluation

E Cardinal, RK Chhem, CG Beauregard, B Aubin and M Pelletier
Department of Radiology, Saint-Luc Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the sonographic findings of plantar fasciitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Both feet of 15 patients who had a clinical diagnosis of plantar fasciitis were evaluated with ultrasound (US) by using a 7.0-MHz linear-array transducer. Heel pain was unilateral in 11 patients and bilateral in four. Sagittal sonograms were obtained, and the thickness of the plantar fascia was measured at its proximal end near its insertion into the calcaneus. Other observations included hypoechoic fascia, fiber rupture, perifascial fluid collections, and calcifications. Both feet of 15 healthy volunteers were also evaluated as a control group. RESULTS: Plantar fascia thickness was significantly increased in the heels in patients with plantar fasciitis (3.2-6.8 mm; mean, 5.2 mm +/- 1.13) compared with their asymptomatic heels (2.0-4.0 mm; mean, 2.9 mm +/- 0.70) (P < .0001) and compared with the heels of the patients in the control group (1.6-3.8 mm; mean, 2.6 mm +/- 0.48) (P < .0001). The proximal plantar fascia of 16 (84%) symptomatic heels were diffusely hypoechoic compared with none of the patients' asymptomatic heels and only one heel of a patient in the volunteer group. No fascia rupture, perifascial fluid collection, or calcifications were identified. CONCLUSION: Increased thickness of the fascia and hypoechoic fascia are sonographic findings of plantar fasciitis. US may be a valuable noninvasive technique for the diagnosis of plantar fasciitis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
J. P. Huerta, J. M. A. Garcia, E. C. Matamoros, J. C. Matamoros, and T. D. Martinez
Relationship of Body Mass Index, Ankle Dorsiflexion, and Foot Pronation on Plantar Fascia Thickness in Healthy, Asymptomatic Subjects
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, September 1, 2008; 98(5): 379 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
D. B. Irving, J. L. Cook, M. A. Young, and H. B. Menz
Impact of Chronic Plantar Heel Pain on Health-Related Quality of Life
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, July 1, 2008; 98(4): 283 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
S Ostlere
Imaging the ankle
Imaging, September 1, 2007; 19(3): 269 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
S. C Wearing, J. E Smeathers, P. M Sullivan, B. Yates, S. R Urry, and P. Dubois
Plantar Fasciitis: Are Pain and Fascial Thickness Associated With Arch Shape and Loading?
Physical Therapy, August 1, 2007; 87(8): 1002 - 1008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
N. Sabir, S. Demirlenk, B. Yagci, N. Karabulut, and S. Cubukcu
Clinical Utility of Sonography in Diagnosing Plantar Fasciitis
J. Ultrasound Med., August 1, 2005; 24(8): 1041 - 1048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
C. M. Sofka, D. Lin, and R. S. Adler
Advantages of Color B-mode Imaging With Contrast Optimization in Sonography of Low-Contrast Musculoskeletal Lesions and Structures in the Foot and Ankle
J. Ultrasound Med., February 1, 2005; 24(2): 215 - 218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. Bernathova, E. Bein, N. Bendix, and G. Bodner
Sonographic Diagnosis of Plantar Vein Thrombosis: Report of 3 Cases
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2005; 24(1): 101 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
W A Schmidt, H Schmidt, B Schicke, and E Gromnica-Ihle
Standard reference values for musculoskeletal ultrasonography
Ann Rheum Dis, August 1, 2004; 63(8): 988 - 994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
S Ostlere
Imaging the ankle and foot
Imaging, December 1, 2003; 15(4): 242 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
D. Kane and O. FitzGerald
Re: The role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of idiopathic plantar fasciitis
Rheumatology, March 1, 2003; 42(3): 486 - 486.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. Buchbinder, R. Ptasznik, J. Gordon, J. Buchanan, V. Prabaharan, and A. Forbes
Ultrasound-Guided Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA, September 18, 2002; 288(11): 1364 - 1372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
P. K. Vohra, B. R. Kincaid, C. J. Japour, and E. Sobel
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Plantar Fascia Bands: A Retrospective Study of 211 Symptomatic Feet
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, September 1, 2002; 92(8): 444 - 449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
P J O'Connor and A J Grainger
Ultrasound imaging of joint disease
Imaging, June 1, 2002; 14(3): 188 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
D. Kane, T. Greaney, M. Shanahan, G. Duffy, B. Bresnihan, R. Gibney, and O. FitzGerald
The role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of idiopathic plantar fasciitis
Rheumatology, September 1, 2001; 40(9): 1002 - 1008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
J. E. Martin, J. C. Hosch, W. P. Goforth, R. T. Murff, D. M. Lynch, and R. D. Odom
Mechanical Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis: A Prospective Study
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, February 1, 2001; 91(2): 55 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Lin, D. P. Fessell, J. A. Jacobson, W. J. Weadock, and C. W. Hayes
An Illustrated Tutorial of Musculoskeletal Sonography: Part 3, Lower Extremity
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2000; 175(5): 1313 - 1321.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
D. J. Theodorou, S. J. Theodorou, Y. Kakitsubata, N. Lektrakul, G. E. Gold, B. Roger, and D. Resnick
Plantar Fasciitis and Fascial Rupture: MR Imaging Findings in 26 Patients Supplemented with Anatomic Data in Cadavers
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2000; 20(90001): 181S - 197.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
D. Kane, T. Greaney, B. Bresnihan, R. Gibney, and O. FitzGerald
Ultrasound guided injection of recalcitrant plantar fasciitis
Ann Rheum Dis, June 1, 1998; 57(6): 383 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1996 by the Radiological Society of North America.