Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schaefer-Prokop, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Galanski, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schaefer-Prokop, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Galanski, M.

Radiology, Vol 201, 45-50, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions

CM Schaefer-Prokop, M Prokop, A Schmidt, U Neitzel and M Galanski
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Germany.

PURPOSE: To compare selenium detectors with three conventional and digital detector systems for the detection of simulated pulmonary lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Templates containing nodules, linear structures, and micronodular opacities were superimposed over an anthropomorphic chest phantom. The authors compared lesion detection with use of storage phosphor radiography (250 speed), selenium radiography (250 speed) with an antiscatter grid, selenium radiography (450 speed) without an antiscatter grid, an asymmetric screen-film system (400 speed), and a conventional screen-film system (250 speed). Detection performance of 10 radiologists was compared by using a multireader-multicase receiver operating characteristic analysis of variance. RESULTS: For the detection of nodules, no statistically significant differences between imaging modes were seen. For the detection of micronodules and linear lesions, both selenium techniques were superior to all other modes (P < .05). In addition, the asymmetric screen-film radiographs were inferior (P < .05) to the conventional screen-film radiographs and to storage phosphor radiographs for the detection of micronodules. CONCLUSION: The selenium detector improves detection of simulated fine linear and low-contrast micronodular details and appears to be superior to other detector systems for chest radiography.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
C S Moore, G P Liney, A W Beavis, and J R Saunderson
A method to optimize the processing algorithm of a computed radiography system for chest radiography
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2007; 80(957): 724 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. J. M. Kroft, W. J. H. Veldkamp, B. J. A. Mertens, J. P. A. van Delft, and J. Geleijns
Detection of simulated nodules on clinical radiographs: dose reduction at digital posteroanterior chest radiography.
Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 392 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Bacher, P. Smeets, L. Vereecken, A. De Hauwere, P. Duyck, R. De Man, K. Verstraete, and H. Thierens
Image quality and radiation dose on digital chest imaging: comparison of amorphous silicon and amorphous selenium flat-panel systems.
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3): 630 - 637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
K Ono, T Yoshitake, K Akahane, Y Yamada, T Maeda, M Kai, and T Kusama
Comparison of a digital flat-panel versus screen-film, photofluorography and storage-phosphor systems by detection of simulated lung adenocarcinoma lesions using hard copy images
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2005; 78(934): 922 - 927.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. J. M. Kroft, W. J. H. Veldkamp, B. J. A. Mertens, M. V. Boot, and J. Geleijns
Comparison of Eight Different Digital Chest Radiography Systems: Variation in Detection of Simulated Chest Disease
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2005; 185(2): 339 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
I D Honey, A Mackenzie, and D S Evans
Investigation of optimum energies for chest imaging using film-screen and computed radiography
Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2005; 78(929): 422 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Metz, P. Damoser, R. Hollweck, R. Roggel, C. Engelke, K. Woertler, B. Renger, E. J. Rummeny, and T. M. Link
Chest Radiography with a Digital Flat-Panel Detector: Experimental Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis
Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 776 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. J. M. Kroft, J. Geleijns, B. J. A. Mertens, W. J. H. Veldkamp, H. M. Zonderland, and A. de Roos
Digital Slot-Scan Charge-coupled Device Radiography versus AMBER and Bucky Screen-Film Radiography for Detection of Simulated Nodules and Interstitial Disease in a Chest Phantom
Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 156 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. M. Goo, J.-G. Im, H. J. Lee, M. J. Chung, J. B. Seo, H. Y. Kim, Y.-J. Lee, J.-W. Kang, and J. H. Kim
Detection of Simulated Chest Lesions by Using Soft-Copy Reading: Comparison of an Amorphous Silicon Flat-Panel-Detector System and a Storage-Phosphor System
Radiology, July 1, 2002; 224(1): 242 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. S. Kim, J.-G. Im, J. M. Goo, K. H. Lee, Y.-J. Lee, S. H. Kim, and S. Kim
Detection of Pulmonary Edema in Pigs: Storage Phosphor versus Amorphous Selenium-based Flat-Panel-Detector Radiography
Radiology, June 1, 2002; 223(3): 695 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Awai, M. Komi, and S. Hori
Selenium-Based Digital Radiography Versus High-Resolution Storage Phosphor Radiography in the Detection of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules Without Calcification: Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2001; 177(5): 1141 - 1144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. M. Goo, J.-G. Im, J. H. Kim, J. B. Seo, T. S. Kim, S. J. Shine, and W. Lee
Digital Chest Radiography with a Selenium-Based Flat-Panel Detector Versus a Storage Phosphor System: Comparison of Soft-Copy Images
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 1013 - 1018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Ludwig, T. M. Link, M. Fiebich, B. Renger, S. Diederich, M. Oelerich, H. Lenzen, and W. Heindel
Selenium-based Digital Radiography in the Detection of Bone Lesions: Preliminary Experience with Experimentally Created Defects
Radiology, July 1, 2000; 216(1): 220 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Garmer, S. P. Hennigs, H. J. Jager, F. Schrick, T. van de Loo, A. Jacobs, A. Hanusch, A. Christmann, and K. Mathias
Digital Radiography Versus Conventional Radiography in Chest Imaging: Diagnostic Performance of a Large-Area Silicon Flat-Panel Detector in a Clinical CT-Controlled Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2000; 174(1): 75 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. M. Bernhardt, D. Otto, G. Reichel, K. Ludwig, S. Seifert, S. Kropf, and U. Rapp-Bernhardt
Detection of Simulated Interstitial Lung Disease and Catheters with Selenium, Storage Phosphor, and Film-based Radiography
Radiology, November 1, 1999; 213(2): 445 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1996 by the Radiological Society of North America.