Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ishigaki, T.
Right arrow Articles by Matsumoto, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ishigaki, T.
Right arrow Articles by Matsumoto, M.

Radiology, Vol 201, 51-60, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Subtle pulmonary disease: detection with computed radiography versus conventional chest radiography

T Ishigaki, T Endo, M Ikeda, M Kono, S Yoshida, J Ikezoe, K Murata and M Matsumoto
Department of Radiology, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Japan.

PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic efficacy of hard- and soft-copy computed radiographic (CR) images versus conventional screen-film images of the chest in the detection of subtle pulmonary abnormalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty observes compared 87 hard-copy and soft- copy CR images with hard-copy screen-film images. Of 87 test images, 45 (including two identical sets of 12 images to test intra-observer variability) were abnormal and 42 (including two identical sets of 12 images) were normal. Of the 45 abnormal images, 15 (including two sets of four identical images) showed subtle abnormalities, 15 (including two sets of four identical images) showed mild abnormalities, and 15 (including two sets of four identical images) showed obvious abnormalities. Soft-copy viewing provided three differently processed images of every radiograph. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in receiver operating characteristic analyses were found among hard-copy screen-film images, hard-copy CR images, and soft-copy CR images, even in the group with subtle interstitial abnormalities. CONCLUSION: Hard-copy and soft-copy chest CR images are acceptable and available in place of screen-film images for primary interpretation of subtle interstitial lung diseases.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
N Buls, W Shabana, P Verbeek, P Pevenage, and J De Mey
Influence of display quality on radiologists' performance in the detection of lung nodules on radiographs
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2007; 80(957): 738 - 743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. J. Karlik
Visualizing Radiologic Data
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2003; 180(3): 607 - 619.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. M. Goo, J.-G. Im, H. J. Lee, M. J. Chung, J. B. Seo, H. Y. Kim, Y.-J. Lee, J.-W. Kang, and J. H. Kim
Detection of Simulated Chest Lesions by Using Soft-Copy Reading: Comparison of an Amorphous Silicon Flat-Panel-Detector System and a Storage-Phosphor System
Radiology, July 1, 2002; 224(1): 242 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. S. Kim, J.-G. Im, J. M. Goo, K. H. Lee, Y.-J. Lee, S. H. Kim, and S. Kim
Detection of Pulmonary Edema in Pigs: Storage Phosphor versus Amorphous Selenium-based Flat-Panel-Detector Radiography
Radiology, June 1, 2002; 223(3): 695 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Y. Kim, K. S. Cho, K.-S. Song, J. H. Kim, J.-G. Kim, and H. K. Ha
Urinary Calculi on Computed Radiography: Comparison of Observer Performance with Hard-Copy Versus Soft-Copy Images on Different Viewer Systems
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177(2): 331 - 335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. P. M. Miró, A. N. Leung, G. D. Rubin, Y. H. Choi, S. T. Kee, R. E. Mindelzun, P. Stark, L. Wexler, S. K. Plevritis, and B. J. Betts
Digital Storage Phosphor Chest Radiography: An ROC Study of the Effect of 2K versus 4K Matrix Size on Observer Performance
Radiology, February 1, 2001; 218(2): 527 - 532.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. M. Goo, J.-G. Im, J. H. Kim, J. B. Seo, T. S. Kim, S. J. Shine, and W. Lee
Digital Chest Radiography with a Selenium-Based Flat-Panel Detector Versus a Storage Phosphor System: Comparison of Soft-Copy Images
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 1013 - 1018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. Iinuma, K. Ushio, T. Ishikawa, S. Nawano, R. Sekiguchi, and M. Satake
Diagnosis of Gastric Cancers: Comparison of Conventional Radiography and Digital Radiography with a 4 Million-Pixel Charge-coupled Device
Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 497 - 502.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Garmer, S. P. Hennigs, H. J. Jager, F. Schrick, T. van de Loo, A. Jacobs, A. Hanusch, A. Christmann, and K. Mathias
Digital Radiography Versus Conventional Radiography in Chest Imaging: Diagnostic Performance of a Large-Area Silicon Flat-Panel Detector in a Clinical CT-Controlled Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2000; 174(1): 75 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1996 by the Radiological Society of North America.