Radiology, Vol 201, 97-105, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Refractory epilepsy: comparison of MR imaging, CT, and histopathologic findings in 117 patients

RA Bronen, RK Fulbright, DD Spencer, SS Spencer, JH Kim, RC Lange and C Sutilla
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.

PURPOSE: We compared computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the detection of abnormalities underlying epilepsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT and MR imaging findings in 117 patients (56 female, 61 male patients; age at surgery, 12-56 years) who underwent surgery for medically refractory epilepsy were compared with histopathologic findings by using the McNemar and chi 2 statistics. RESULTS: Sensitivities for detecting abnormalities were 95% (104 of 109) for MR imaging and 32% (35 of 109) for CT; specificities were 87% (13 of 15) for MR imaging and 93% (14 of 15) for CT (P < .001 for MR versus histopathologic findings). In the subgroup of 113 patients with solitary findings, MR imaging depicted an abnormality at the surgical site in 86% (n = 97) of 113 patients compared to 28% (n = 32) for CT (P < .001). In this same subgroup, histopathologic findings were predicted by using MR imaging in 88% (n = 99) of 113 patients versus 35% (n = 40) with CT (P < .001). Multiple findings were observed in 3% of CT (three of 117) and 17% of MR (20 of 117) images. CONCLUSION: CT has no role in the diagnostic evaluation of medically refractory epilepsy. Even in patients with medically controlled epilepsy, use of less costly CT instead of MR imaging seems imprudent.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. A. French and T. A. Pedley Initial Management of Epilepsy N. Engl. J. Med., July 10, 2008; 359(2): 166 - 176. [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. O. Tatum IV, S. R. Benbadis, and F. L. Vale The Neurosurgical Treatment of Epilepsy Arch Fam Med, November 1, 2000; 9(10): 1142 - 1147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]