Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Waltman, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Waltman, A. C.

Radiology, Vol 201, 725-730, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Long-term outcomes of radiologically placed arm ports

JA Kaufman, H Salamipour, SC Geller, SM Rivitz and AC Waltman
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114, USA.

PURPOSE: To evaluate long-term outcomes of an initial experience with radiologic placement of arm ports. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The follow-up of 46 consecutive arm port placements (44 patients) was reviewed by means of chart review (hospital, office, and clinic) in 41 patients, telephone interview in 20, physical, examination in 15, and venous ultrasound in 14. Data on port complications and function were recorded. Statistical methods were the Fisher Exact Test and Cochran- Mantel-Haenszel Test. RESULTS: Technical success for placement was 100%. Follow-up was obtained in 41 (93%) of the 44 patients (43 ports); mean days of catheter use was 344 days (total, 14,797 days; range, 10- 1,104 days; median, 278 days). Rate (per 100 catheter days) of symptomatic central venous thrombosis was 0.054; arm phlebitis, 0.007; confirmed infection, 0.034; and catheter dysfunction, 0.095. Prophylactic anti-coagulants did not affect symptomatic central venous thrombosis (P > .05, Fisher Exact Test). Catheter tip high in the right atrium was marginally associated with better catheter function (P = .041, Fischer Exact Test). CONCLUSION: Good long-term results can be anticipated with radiologic placement of arm ports.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1996 by the Radiological Society of North America.