Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rubenstein, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Henkelman, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rubenstein, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Henkelman, R. M.

Radiology, Vol 201, 843-850, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Effects of compression and recovery on bovine articular cartilage: appearance on MR images

JD Rubenstein, JK Kim and RM Henkelman
Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Science Center, Ontario, Canada.

PURPOSE: To determine the influence of compression and decompression on bovine articular cartilage as it appears on magnetic resonance (MR) images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive spin-echo MR images (repetition time msec/echo time msec = 800/33) of normal bovine cartilage were obtained with increasing increments of pressure, to a maximum of 4.14 MPa (600 psi); this was followed by consecutive MR imaging after release of the pressure. RESULTS: Before compression, cartilage showed a laminated appearance. After incremental pressure, cartilage thickness progressively decreased; a short T2, low-signal- intensity lamina became thicker and more distinct at the articular surface; signal intensity of the deep cartilage zone initially was high and then gradually decreased; and at maximum pressure, the cartilage showed uniform low signal intensity. After release of pressure, signal intensity changes in the cartilage were sequentially reversed from those observed with compression. Image resolution and echo time influenced the appearance of these findings, particularly the low- signal-intensity line at the cartilage interface. CONCLUSION: The varying appearance and signal intensity characteristics of cartilage under pressure are hypothesized to result from a combination of net water loss and alteration in collagen orientational structure.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. A. Kessler, C. Glaser, S. Tittel, M. Reiser, and A. B. Imhoff
Recovery of the Menisci and Articular Cartilage of Runners After Cessation of Exercise: Additional Aspects of In Vivo Investigation Based on 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2008; 36(5): 966 - 970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
H. G. Potter and L. F. Foo
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Articular Cartilage: Trauma, Degeneration, and Repair
Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2006; 34(4): 661 - 677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. P. Recht, D. W. Goodwin, C. S. Winalski, and L. M. White
MRI of Articular Cartilage: Revisiting Current Status and Future Directions
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 899 - 914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. J. Mosher, H. E. Smith, C. Collins, Y. Liu, J. Hancy, B. J. Dardzinski, and M. B. Smith
Change in Knee Cartilage T2 at MR Imaging after Running: A Feasibility Study
Radiology, January 1, 2005; 234(1): 245 - 249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. J. Karlik
Visualizing Radiologic Data
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2003; 180(3): 607 - 619.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. J. Dardzinski, T. Laor, V. J. Schmithorst, L. Klosterman, and T. B. Graham
Mapping T2 Relaxation Time in the Pediatric Knee: Feasibility with a Clinical 1.5-T MR Imaging System
Radiology, October 1, 2002; 225(1): 233 - 239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. J. Mosher, H. Smith, B. J. Dardzinski, V. J. Schmithorst, and M. B. Smith
MR Imaging and T2 Mapping of Femoral Cartilage: In Vivo Determination of the Magic Angle Effect
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2001; 177(3): 665 - 669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
T. R. McCauley and D. G. Disler
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Articular Cartilage of the Knee
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., January 1, 2001; 9(1): 2 - 8.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. J. Varich, T. Laor, and D. Jaramillo
Normal Maturation of the Distal Femoral Epiphyseal Cartilage: Age-related Changes at MR Imaging
Radiology, March 1, 2000; 214(3): 705 - 709.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. W. Goodwin, H. Zhu, and J. F. Dunn
In Vitro MR Imaging of Hyaline Cartilage: Correlation with Scanning Electron Microscopy
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2000; 174(2): 405 - 409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1996 by the Radiological Society of North America.