Radiology, Vol 202, 159-165, Copyright © 1997 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Focal hepatic lesions: effect of three-dimensional wavelet compression on detection at CT

MA Goldberg, GS Gazelle, GW Boland, PF Hahn, WW Mayo-Smith, M Pivovarov, EF Halpern and J Wittenberg
Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of three-dimensional, wavelet-based compression on the detection of focal hepatic lesions at computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT images obtained in 69 patients with focal hepatic lesions were studied (35 consecutive cases and 34 cases selected to be difficult on the basis of lesion size or contrast). Image data were compressed by means of a three-dimensional, wavelet-based algorIthm at ratios of 10:1, 15:1, and 20:1. Normal and abnormal sections (on original and compressed images) were reviewed by using an interactive workstation. Four readers rated the presence or absence of a lesion with a five-point scale. RESULTS: At receiver operating characteristic analysis, no statistically significant difference was detected for all cases considered together. Differences approached but did not reach statistical significance for the diagnostic performance of one reader with compressed images (15:1, P = .054; 20:1, P = .051). For the subset of difficult cases, a significant difference was observed with 20:1 compressed images for one reader (P = .026). Diagnostic performance of readers was less certain in normal than in abnormal cases with both original and compressed images (difference was significant for 15:1 [P = .035] and 20:1 [P < .0001] compressed images). CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional wavelet compression is satisfactory at ratios of at least 10:1. Additional studies with a larger sample would help confirm findings with higher ratios.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Bajpai, K. H. Lee, B. Kim, K. J. Kim, T. J. Kim, Y. H. Kim, and H. S. Kang Differences in Compression Artifacts on Thin- and Thick-Section Lung CT Images Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): W38 - W43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Ringl, R. Schernthaner, E. Sala, K. El-Rabadi, M. Weber, W. Schima, C. J. Herold, and A. K. Dixon Lossy 3D JPEG2000 Compression of Abdominal CT Images in Patients with Acute Abdominal Complaints: Effect of Compression Ratio on Diagnostic Confidence and Accuracy Radiology, August 1, 2008; 248(2): 476 - 484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Kim, K. H. Lee, K. J. Kim, R. Mantiuk, H.-r. Kim, and Y. H. Kim Artifacts in Slab Average-Intensity-Projection Images Reformatted from JPEG 2000 Compressed Thin-Section Abdominal CT Data Sets Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): W342 - W350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Kim, K. H. Lee, K. J. Kim, R. Mantiuk, S. Hahn, T. J. Kim, and Y. H. Kim Prediction of Perceptible Artifacts in JPEG 2000 Compressed Chest CT Images Using Mathematical and Perceptual Quality Metrics Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 328 - 334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Ringl, R. E. Schernthaner, C. Kulinna-Cosentini, M. Weber, C. Schaefer-Prokop, C. J. Herold, and W. Schima Lossy Three-dimensional JPEG2000 Compression of Abdominal CT Images: Assessment of the Visually Lossless Threshold and Effect of Compression Ratio on Image Quality Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 467 - 474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. S. Woo, K. J. Kim, T. J. Kim, S. Hahn, B. Kim, Y. H. Kim, and K. H. Lee JPEG 2000 Compression of Abdominal CT: Difference in Tolerance Between Thin- and Thick-Section Images Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2007; 189(3): 535 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Ko, J. Chang, E. Bomsztyk, J. S. Babb, D. P. Naidich, and H. Rusinek Effect of CT Image Compression on Computer-assisted Lung Nodule Volume Measurement Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 83 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Ko, H. Rusinek, D. P. Naidich, G. McGuinness, A. N. Rubinowitz, B. S. Leitman, and J. M. Martino Wavelet Compression of Low-Dose Chest CT Data: Effect on Lung Nodule Detection Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 70 - 75. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Ohgiya, T. Gokan, H. Nobusawa, M. Hirose, N. Seino, H. Fujisawa, M. Baba, K. Nagai, K. Tanno, N. Takeyama, et al. Acute Cerebral Infarction: Effect of JPEG Compression on Detection at CT Radiology, April 1, 2003; 227(1): 124 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Zalis, P. F. Hahn, R. S. Arellano, G. S. Gazelle, and P. R. Mueller CT Colonography with Teleradiology: Effect of Lossy Wavelet Compression on Polyp Detection—Initial Observations Radiology, August 1, 2001; 220(2): 387 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Kalyanpur, V. P. Neklesa, C. R. Taylor, A. R. Daftary, and J. A. Brink Evaluation of JPEG and Wavelet Compression of Body CT Images for Direct Digital Teleradiologic Transmission Radiology, December 1, 2000; 217(3): 772 - 779. [Abstract] [Full Text]