Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Szolar, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Schreyer, H. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Szolar, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Schreyer, H. H.

Radiology, Vol 202, 211-217, Copyright © 1997 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Multiphasic helical CT of the kidney: increased conspicuity for detection and characterization of small (< 3-cm) renal masses

DH Szolar, F Kammerhuber, S Altziebler, M Tillich, E Breinl, R Fotter and HH Schreyer
Department of Radiology, Karl-Franzens Medical School and University Hospital, Graz, Austria.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential of thin-section multiphasic helical computed tomography (CT) in the detection and characterization of small (< 3.0-cm) renal masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Identically collimated helical CT of the kidney was performed before and after administration of contrast material in 93 patients with small renal masses. Helical CT scans were obtained during the corticomedullary and nephrographic phases. Differences between attenuation of the lesion and that of the kidney were measured quantitatively. The presence of a mass or absence of disease was confirmed with clinical, imaging, and histologic findings. RESULTS: The number of masses smaller than 3.0 cm detected on corticomedullary-phase scans (n = 211) was statistically significantly fewer than those on nephrographic-phase scans (n = 295) (P < .01). Mean differences in enhancement between the renal cortex and masses were 148 HU +/- 54 and 137 HU +/- 44 during the corticomedullary and nephrographic phases, respectively, and the difference in attenuation of the renal medulla and that of the masses was statistically significantly greater during the nephrographic phase (P < .01). False- positive results (n = 9) occurred only on corticomedullary-phase scans because of lack of enhancement of the renal medulla. CONCLUSION: Nephrographic-phase scans enabled greater lesion detection and better characterization of small renal masses than corticomedullary-phase scans. Nephrographic-phase scans should be obtained when only monophasic scanning is used to detect small renal masses.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
C. Symeonidou, R. Standish, A. Sahdev, R. D. Katz, J. Morlese, and A. Malhotra
Imaging and Histopathologic Features of HIV-related Renal Disease
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2008; 28(5): 1339 - 1354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
L R Williams, M J Oldale, and A J Bradley
Imaging renal masses and staging renal tumours
Imaging, March 1, 2008; 20(1): 73 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Silverman, S. A. Akbar, K. J. Mortele, K. Tuncali, J. G. Bhagwat, and J. L. Seifter
Multi-Detector Row CT Urography of Normal Urinary Collecting System: Furosemide versus Saline as Adjunct to Contrast Medium
Radiology, September 1, 2006; 240(3): 749 - 755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. Sheth, S. Ali, and E. Fishman
Imaging of renal lymphoma: patterns of disease with pathologic correlation.
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2006; 26(4): 1151 - 1168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
R. F. J. Browne, C. P. Meehan, J. Colville, R. Power, and W. C. Torreggiani
Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Upper Urinary Tract: Spectrum of Imaging Findings
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2005; 25(6): 1609 - 1627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. Liu, K. J. Mortele, and S. G. Silverman
Incidental Extraurinary Findings at MDCT Urography in Patients with Hematuria: Prevalence and Impact on Imaging Costs
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 1051 - 1056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Y. Lee, J. P. Heiken, P. C. Huettner, and W. Na-ChiangMai
Renal Cell Carcinoma Visible Only During the Corticomedullary Phase of Enhancement
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2005; 184(3_supp): S104 - S106.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Kawamoto, L. P. Lawler, and E. K. Fishman
Evaluation of the Renal Venous System on Late Arterial and Venous Phase Images with MDCT Angiography in Potential Living Laparoscopic Renal Donors
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 539 - 545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. J. Ruppert-Kohlmayr, M. Uggowitzer, T. Meissnitzer, and G. Ruppert
Differentiation of Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma and Renal Papillary Carcinoma Using Quantitative CT Enhancement Parameters
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2004; 183(5): 1387 - 1391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Jinzaki, J. D. McTavish, K. H. Zou, P. F. Judy, and S. G. Silverman
Evaluation of Small (<= 3 cm) Renal Masses with MDCT: Benefits of Thin Overlapping Reconstructions
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2004; 183(1): 223 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. A. Joffe, S. Servaes, S. Okon, and M. Horowitz
Multi-Detector Row CT Urography in the Evaluation of Hematuria
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2003; 23(6): 1441 - 1455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
C Walter, M Kruessell, A Gindele, H G Brochhagen, A Gossmann, and P Landwehr
Imaging of renal lesions: evaluation of fast MRI and helical CT
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2003; 76(910): 696 - 703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. R. Herts, D. M. Coll, A. C. Novick, N. Obuchowski, G. Linnell, S. L. Wirth, and M. E. Baker
Enhancement Characteristics of Papillary Renal Neoplasms Revealed on Triphasic Helical CT of the Kidneys
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2002; 178(2): 367 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. Sheth, J. C. Scatarige, K. M. Horton, F. M. Corl, and E. K. Fishman
Current Concepts in the Diagnosis and Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Role of Multidetector CT and Three-dimensional CT
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2001; 21(90001): S237 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. J. Zagoria
Imaging of Small Renal Masses: A Medical Success Story
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 945 - 955.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Scialpi, A. Di Maggio, M. Midiri, A. Loperfido, G. Angelelli, and A. Rotondo
Small Renal Masses: Assessment of Lesion Characterization and Vascularity on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging with Fat Suppression
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2000; 175(3): 751 - 757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. D. Hopper, K. Singapuri, and A. Finkel
Body CT and Oncologic Imaging
Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 27 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
B. A. Urban and E. K. Fishman
Renal Lymphoma: CT Patterns with Emphasis on Helical CT
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2000; 20(1): 197 - 212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. Hawnaur
Recent advances: Diagnostic radiology
BMJ, July 17, 1999; 319(7203): 168 - 171.
[Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. A. Birnbaum, J. E. Jacobs, C. P. Langlotz, and P. Ramchandani
Assessment of a Bolus-tracking Technique in Helical Renal CT to Optimize Nephrographic Phase Imaging
Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 87 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. H. McCollough, M. R. Bruesewitz, T. J. Vrtiska, B. F. King, A. J. LeRoy, J. P. Quam, and R. R. Hattery
Image Quality and Dose Comparison among Screen-Film, Computed, and CT Scanned Projection Radiography: Applications to CT Urography
Radiology, November 1, 2001; 221(2): 395 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1997 by the Radiological Society of North America.