Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lawrance, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lawrance, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, R. C.

Radiology, Vol 203, 115-119, Copyright © 1997 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Zebra pattern: a diagnostically challenging hepatic parenchymal enhancement pattern at CT arterial portography

JA Lawrance, VG McDermott, EK Paulson, MT Keogan, DM Delong, WC Meyers and RC Nelson
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of arterial injection site and splenic volume on the hepatic zebra pattern seen at computed tomographic (CT) arterial portography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images from CT arterial portographic examinations, performed via either the splenic artery (SA)(n = 47) or superior mesenteric artery (SMA)(n = 51) in 98 patients, were reviewed. The hepatic parenchymal enhancement pattern was assessed by three blinded reviewers. Splenic volume was determined. RESULTS: Twenty-two of 98 (22%) CT arterial portographic studies showed a zebra pattern: 10 of 47 (21%) with injection via the SA and 12 of 51 (24%) with injection via the SMA. The mean percentage of hepatic parenchyma with nontumorous perfusion defects was 55% with the zebra pattern versus 12% without (P < .001). For SA injections, the mean splenic volume was lower in patients with the zebra patterns (321 vs 409 cm3, P = .09). For SMA injections, it was higher in patients with zebra patterns (372 vs 291 cm3, P = .10). CONCLUSION: The zebra pattern can cause difficulties in interpreting images. It is due to alternating, well-defined regions of portal venous hyper- and hypoperfusion; it likely has a multifactorial cause and is likely due to technical parameters such as the injection site, the volume of the spleen, and the hemodynamic effects of the tumor.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1997 by the Radiological Society of North America.