Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuhl, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Schild, H. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuhl, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Schild, H. H.

Radiology, Vol 203, 137-144, Copyright © 1997 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical- phase dependency

CK Kuhl, HB Bieling, J Gieseke, BP Kreft, T Sommer, G Lutterbey and HH Schild
Department of Radiology, University of Bonn, Germany.

PURPOSE: To define the range of normal contrast medium enhancement, the variability in contrast medium enhancement patterns in healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma, and the implications for management strategies in cases with incidental contrast medium-enhancing foci on breast magnetic resonance (MR) images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers (aged 21-41 years) were examined on a 1.5-T system (dynamic two-dimensional gradient-echo protocol with subtraction postprocessing) during each week of a menstrual cycle (group 1) or over 4 months (group 2). The authors evaluated changes in the number of enhancing foci and the respective enhancement patterns within a cycle and between cycles. RESULTS: Both diffuse and nodular enhancement of breast parenchyma occurred during all phases of the menstrual cycle, especially in weeks 1 and 4. Enhancement was lowest in week 2. A total of 60 enhancing foci (73% of which resolved completely during follow- up) were found in 16 of 20 volunteers. Twenty-six foci demonstrated enhancement velocities beyond the malignancy threshold (>80% increase in the 1st minute). CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhancing foci are normal in healthy premenopausal breasts, even when formal malignancy criteria of enhancement velocity are met. This has to be kept in mind to avoid false-positive results, especially in younger patients.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Schrading and C. K. Kuhl
Mammographic, US, and MR Imaging Phenotypes of Familial Breast Cancer
Radiology, January 1, 2008; 246(1): 58 - 70.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. C. Riedl, L. Ponhold, D. Flory, M. Weber, R. Kroiss, T. Wagner, M. Fuchsjager, and T. H. Helbich
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast Improves Detection of Invasive Cancer, Preinvasive Cancer, and Premalignant Lesions during Surveillance of Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2007; 13(20): 6144 - 6152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. Bartella, S. B. Thakur, E. A. Morris, D. D. Dershaw, W. Huang, E. Chough, M. C. Cruz, and L. Liberman
Enhancing Nonmass Lesions in the Breast: Evaluation with Proton (1H) MR Spectroscopy
Radiology, October 1, 2007; 245(1): 80 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J.-M. Lee, J. B. Kaplan, M. P. Murray, L. Bartella, E. A. Morris, S. Joo, D. D. Dershaw, and L. Liberman
Imaging Histologic Discordance at MRI-Guided 9-Gauge Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2007; 189(4): 852 - 859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Kuhl
The Current Status of Breast MR Imaging * Part I. Choice of Technique, Image Interpretation, Diagnostic Accuracy, and Transfer to Clinical Practice
Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 356 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. Pediconi, C. Catalano, A. Roselli, S. Padula, F. Altomari, E. Moriconi, A. M. Pronio, M. A. Kirchin, and R. Passariello
Contrast-enhanced MR Mammography for Evaluation of the Contralateral Breast in Patients with Diagnosed Unilateral Breast Cancer or High-Risk Lesions
Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 670 - 680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. Sardanelli, F. Podo, G. D'Agnolo, A. Verdecchia, M. Santaquilani, R. Musumeci, G. Trecate, S. Manoukian, S. Morassut, C. de Giacomi, et al.
Multicenter Comparative Multimodality Surveillance of Women at Genetic-Familial High Risk for Breast Cancer (HIBCRIT Study): Interim Results
Radiology, March 1, 2007; 242(3): 698 - 715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
K. J. Macura, R. Ouwerkerk, M. A. Jacobs, and D. A. Bluemke
Patterns of Enhancement on Breast MR Images: Interpretation and Imaging Pitfalls
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2006; 26(6): 1719 - 1734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. R. Fischer, A. Malich, S. Wurdinger, J. Boettcher, M. Dietzel, and W. A. Kaiser
The adjacent vessel on dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): W147 - W151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Orel, M. Rosen, C. Mies, and M. D. Schnall
MR Imaging-guided 9-gauge Vacuum-assisted Core-Needle Breast Biopsy: Initial Experience
Radiology, December 1, 2005; 238(1): 54 - 61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. M. L. Warren, L. Pointon, D. Thompson, R. Hoff, F. J. Gilbert, A. Padhani, D. Easton, S. R. Lakhani, M. O. Leach, and For the UK Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Sc
Reading Protocol for Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Images of the Breast: Sensitivity and Specificity Analysis
Radiology, September 1, 2005; 236(3): 779 - 788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman, N. Bracero, E. Morris, C. Thornton, and D. D. Dershaw
MRI-Guided 9-Gauge Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy: Initial Clinical Experience
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2005; 185(1): 183 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. M. Kavanagh, J. Cawson, G. B. Byrnes, G. G. Giles, G. Marr, B. Tong, D. M. Gertig, and J. L. Hopper
Hormone Replacement Therapy, Percent Mammographic Density, and Sensitivity of Mammography
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2005; 14(5): 1060 - 1064.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J.-P. Delille, P. J. Slanetz, E. D. Yeh, D. B. Kopans, E. F. Halpern, and L. Garrido
Hormone Replacement Therapy in Postmenopausal Women: Breast Tissue Perfusion Determined with MR Imaging--Initial Observations
Radiology, April 1, 2005; 235(1): 36 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. E. Deurloo, S. H. Muller, J. L. Peterse, A. P. E. Besnard, and K. G. A. Gilhuijs
Clinically and Mammographically Occult Breast Lesions on MR Images: Potential Effect of Computerized Assessment on Clinical Reading
Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 693 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. A. Bluemke, C. A. Gatsonis, M. H. Chen, G. A. DeAngelis, N. DeBruhl, S. Harms, S. H. Heywang-Kobrunner, N. Hylton, C. K. Kuhl, C. Lehman, et al.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast Prior to Biopsy
JAMA, December 8, 2004; 292(22): 2735 - 2742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. Huang, P. R. Fisher, K. Dulaimy, L. A. Tudorica, B. O'Hea, and T. M. Button
Detection of Breast Malignancy: Diagnostic MR Protocol for Improved Specificity
Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 585 - 591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Teifke, H. A. Lehr, T. W. Vomweg, A. Hlawatsch, and M. Thelen
Outcome Analysis and Rational Management of Enhancing Lesions Incidentally Detected on Contrast-Enhanced MRI of the Breast
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2003; 181(3): 655 - 662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. A. Morris, L. Liberman, D. D. Dershaw, J. B. Kaplan, L. R. LaTrenta, A. F. Abramson, and D. J. Ballon
Preoperative MR Imaging--Guided Needle Localization of Breast Lesions
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2002; 178(5): 1211 - 1220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. J. Stoutjesdijk, C. Boetes, G. J. Jager, L. Beex, P. Bult, J. H. C. L. Hendriks, R. J. F. Laheij, L. Massuger, L. E. van Die, T. Wobbes, et al.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Mammography in Women With a Hereditary Risk of Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, July 18, 2001; 93(14): 1095 - 1102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Orel and M. D. Schnall
MR Imaging of the Breast for the Detection, Diagnosis, and Staging of Breast Cancer
Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 13 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Brown, R. C. Smith, and C. H. Lee
Incidental Enhancing Lesions Found on MR Imaging of the Breast
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2001; 176(5): 1249 - 1254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. A. Kvistad, J. Rydland, J. Vainio, H. B. Smethurst, S. Lundgren, H. E. Fjøsne, and O. Haraldseth
Breast Lesions: Evaluation with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR Imaging and with T2*-weighted First-Pass Perfusion MR Imaging
Radiology, August 1, 2000; 216(2): 545 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. K. Kuhl, R. K. Schmutzler, C. C. Leutner, A. Kempe, E. Wardelmann, A. Hocke, M. Maringa, U. Pfeifer, D. Krebs, and H. H. Schild
Breast MR Imaging Screening in 192 Women Proved or Suspected to Be Carriers of a Breast Cancer Susceptibility Gene: Preliminary Results
Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 267 - 279.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
I.-M. A. Obdeijn, E. M. J. Brouwers-Kuyper, M. M. A. Tilanus-Linthorst, T. Wiggers, and M. Oudkerk
MR Imaging-Guided Sonography Followed by Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology in Occult Carcinoma of the Breast
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2000; 174(4): 1079 - 1084.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
C. J. Baines and R. Dayan
A Tangled Web: Factors Likely to Affect the Efficacy of Screening Mammography
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 19, 1999; 91(10): 833 - 838.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Orel
Differentiating Benign from Malignant Enhancing Lesions Identified at MR Imaging of the Breast: Are Time–Signal Intensity Curves an Accurate Predictor?
Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 5 - 7.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1997 by the Radiological Society of North America.