Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woodard, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Jost, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woodard, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Jost, R. G.

Radiology, Vol 203, 197-201, Copyright © 1997 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Chest radiography: depiction of normal anatomy and pathologic structures with selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional screen-film radiography

PK Woodard, RM Slone, DS Gierada, GG Reiker, TK Pilgram and RG Jost
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.

PURPOSE: To compare the subjective visibility of normal anatomy and pathologic structures in the chest on conventional screen-film radiographs versus selenium-based digital radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Screen-film and digital standard posteroanterior (PA) and lateral chest radiographs were obtained in 49 patients (32 men, 17 women; mean age, 60 years; range, 24-91 years) undergoing chest computed tomography (CT). Conventional images were phototimed at 115 kVp with use of a wide-latitude screen-film system and an antiscatter grid. Digital images were obtained at 150 kVp with use of a commercial system with a selenium detector and an air gap alone for scatter reduction. The image sets were independently compared by four radiologists, and the relative visibility of anatomic and pathologic features (proved at CT) was graded. Statistical significance (P < .0028) was evaluated with a one-tailed t test. RESULTS: Visibility with the digital images was statistically significantly increased for 11 of 13 normal anatomic features and for pathologic structures in the lung, soft tissue, and bone. CONCLUSION: Subjective visibility of pathologic structures and most normal anatomic features in the thorax was statistically significantly improved with selenium-based digital chest radiography compared with conventional screen-film chest radiography.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
O. W. Hamer, C. B. Sirlin, M. Strotzer, I. Borisch, N. Zorger, S. Feuerbach, and M. Volk
Chest Radiography with a Flat-Panel Detector: Image Quality with Dose Reduction after Copper Filtration
Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 691 - 700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Metz, P. Damoser, R. Hollweck, R. Roggel, C. Engelke, K. Woertler, B. Renger, E. J. Rummeny, and T. M. Link
Chest Radiography with a Digital Flat-Panel Detector: Experimental Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis
Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 776 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. S. Kim, J.-G. Im, J. M. Goo, K. H. Lee, Y.-J. Lee, S. H. Kim, and S. Kim
Detection of Pulmonary Edema in Pigs: Storage Phosphor versus Amorphous Selenium-based Flat-Panel-Detector Radiography
Radiology, June 1, 2002; 223(3): 695 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Strotzer, M. Volk, R. Frund, O. Hamer, N. Zorger, and S. Feuerbach
Routine Chest Radiography Using a Flat-Panel Detector: Image Quality at Standard Detector Dose and 33% Dose Reduction
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2002; 178(1): 169 - 171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. M. Goo, J.-G. Im, J. H. Kim, J. B. Seo, T. S. Kim, S. J. Shine, and W. Lee
Digital Chest Radiography with a Selenium-Based Flat-Panel Detector Versus a Storage Phosphor System: Comparison of Soft-Copy Images
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 1013 - 1018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. P. Frush, L. F. Donnelly, and H. G. Chotas
Contemporary Pediatric Thoracic Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2000; 175(3): 841 - 851.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Ludwig, T. M. Link, M. Fiebich, B. Renger, S. Diederich, M. Oelerich, H. Lenzen, and W. Heindel
Selenium-based Digital Radiography in the Detection of Bone Lesions: Preliminary Experience with Experimentally Created Defects
Radiology, July 1, 2000; 216(1): 220 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. M. Slone, D. H. Foos, B. R. Whiting, E. Muka, D. A. Rubin, T. K. Pilgram, K. S. Kohm, S. S. Young, P. Ho, and D. D. Hendrickson
Assessment of Visually Lossless Irreversible Image Compression: Comparison of Three Methods by Using an Image-Comparison Workstation
Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 543 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. G. Chotas, J. T. Dobbins III, and C. E. Ravin
Principles of Digital Radiography with Large-Area, Electronically Readable Detectors: A Review of the Basics
Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 595 - 599.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1997 by the Radiological Society of North America.