|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 203, 197-201, Copyright © 1997 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
PK Woodard, RM Slone, DS Gierada, GG Reiker, TK Pilgram and RG Jost
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
PURPOSE: To compare the subjective visibility of normal anatomy and pathologic structures in the chest on conventional screen-film radiographs versus selenium-based digital radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Screen-film and digital standard posteroanterior (PA) and lateral chest radiographs were obtained in 49 patients (32 men, 17 women; mean age, 60 years; range, 24-91 years) undergoing chest computed tomography (CT). Conventional images were phototimed at 115 kVp with use of a wide-latitude screen-film system and an antiscatter grid. Digital images were obtained at 150 kVp with use of a commercial system with a selenium detector and an air gap alone for scatter reduction. The image sets were independently compared by four radiologists, and the relative visibility of anatomic and pathologic features (proved at CT) was graded. Statistical significance (P < .0028) was evaluated with a one-tailed t test. RESULTS: Visibility with the digital images was statistically significantly increased for 11 of 13 normal anatomic features and for pathologic structures in the lung, soft tissue, and bone. CONCLUSION: Subjective visibility of pathologic structures and most normal anatomic features in the thorax was statistically significantly improved with selenium-based digital chest radiography compared with conventional screen-film chest radiography.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. W. Hamer, C. B. Sirlin, M. Strotzer, I. Borisch, N. Zorger, S. Feuerbach, and M. Volk Chest Radiography with a Flat-Panel Detector: Image Quality with Dose Reduction after Copper Filtration Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 691 - 700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Metz, P. Damoser, R. Hollweck, R. Roggel, C. Engelke, K. Woertler, B. Renger, E. J. Rummeny, and T. M. Link Chest Radiography with a Digital Flat-Panel Detector: Experimental Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 776 - 784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. S. Kim, J.-G. Im, J. M. Goo, K. H. Lee, Y.-J. Lee, S. H. Kim, and S. Kim Detection of Pulmonary Edema in Pigs: Storage Phosphor versus Amorphous Selenium-based Flat-Panel-Detector Radiography Radiology, June 1, 2002; 223(3): 695 - 701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Strotzer, M. Volk, R. Frund, O. Hamer, N. Zorger, and S. Feuerbach Routine Chest Radiography Using a Flat-Panel Detector: Image Quality at Standard Detector Dose and 33% Dose Reduction Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2002; 178(1): 169 - 171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Goo, J.-G. Im, J. H. Kim, J. B. Seo, T. S. Kim, S. J. Shine, and W. Lee Digital Chest Radiography with a Selenium-Based Flat-Panel Detector Versus a Storage Phosphor System: Comparison of Soft-Copy Images Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 1013 - 1018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Frush, L. F. Donnelly, and H. G. Chotas Contemporary Pediatric Thoracic Imaging Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2000; 175(3): 841 - 851. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ludwig, T. M. Link, M. Fiebich, B. Renger, S. Diederich, M. Oelerich, H. Lenzen, and W. Heindel Selenium-based Digital Radiography in the Detection of Bone Lesions: Preliminary Experience with Experimentally Created Defects Radiology, July 1, 2000; 216(1): 220 - 224. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Slone, D. H. Foos, B. R. Whiting, E. Muka, D. A. Rubin, T. K. Pilgram, K. S. Kohm, S. S. Young, P. Ho, and D. D. Hendrickson Assessment of Visually Lossless Irreversible Image Compression: Comparison of Three Methods by Using an Image-Comparison Workstation Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 543 - 553. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. G. Chotas, J. T. Dobbins III, and C. E. Ravin Principles of Digital Radiography with Large-Area, Electronically Readable Detectors: A Review of the Basics Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 595 - 599. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |