Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kobayashi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Nakagawa, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kobayashi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Nakagawa, T.

Radiology, Vol 203, 377-382, Copyright © 1997 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Uterine neoplasms: magnetization transfer analysis of MR images

S Kobayashi, K Takeda, H Sakuma, Y Kinosada and T Nakagawa
Department of Radiology, Mie University School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the magnetization transfer effects seen at fast spin-echo (SE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging provide additional information in the diagnosis of uterine neoplasms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR images were obtained in 58 subjects with a normal uterus, 27 patients with cervical carcinoma (17 before therapy; 10 after irradiation), 10 with endometrial carcinoma, and five with endometrial hyperplasia. The magnetization transfer ratios (MTRs) were calculated by measuring the signal intensity on the central section of multisection fast SE images (15 sections) and that on a single-section fast SE image (5,000/136 [repetition time msec/echo time msec]). The additional imaging time required for MTR measurement was 4 minutes. RESULTS: Conspicuity of lesions and normal zonal anatomy was improved with single-section fast SE. The mean MTR in untreated cervical carcinoma (37.6% +/- 4.2 [standard deviation]) showed a statistically significant increase relative to that in irradiated cervical carcinoma (24.5% +/- 5.1, P < .01), normal cervical stroma (23.8% +/- 6.7, P < .01), or normal endocervix (24.2% +/- 7.3, P < .01). The mean MTR in endometrial carcinoma (34.5% +/- 3.6) was significantly higher than that in endometrial hyperplasia (25.5% +/- 1.5, P < .01) or normal endometrium (24.3% +/- 3.6, P < .01). CONCLUSION: Single-section fast SE imaging provides better lesion contrast than multisection fast SE imaging and enables quantification of the MTRs in uterine neoplasms.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1997 by the Radiological Society of North America.