Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huda, W.
Right arrow Articles by Cumming, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huda, W.
Right arrow Articles by Cumming, W. A.

Radiology, Vol 203, 417-422, Copyright © 1997 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

An approach for the estimation of effective radiation dose at CT in pediatric patients

W Huda, JV Atherton, DE Ware and WA Cumming
Department of Radiology, Health Science Center, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville 32610-0374, USA.

PURPOSE: To estimate the effective radiation dose to pediatric and adult patients at head and abdomen computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cylindrical water-equivalent phantoms were modeled for patients aged newborn to adult, and the energy imparted per unit axial exposure was computed. To determine the energy imparted to the simulated patients of different ages undergoing head and abdomen CT examinations, x-ray technique factors were combined with measured CT axial exposures. Body-region-specific ratios were calculated for effective dose per unit energy imparted, and these ratios were corrected for patient mass to obtain the effective dose to simulated patients. RESULTS: With use of standard techniques, the energy imparted to simulated patients at CT always increased with patient size, but the effective dose was higher in children than in adults. At CT in the head and abdomen, effective doses were highest in newborns. Effective doses ranged from 1.5 to 6.0 mSv in head CT examinations and from 3.1 to 5.3 mSv in abdomen CT examinations. CONCLUSION: The values for energy imparted at CT in pediatric patients were generally lower than in adults. The smaller mass of children, however, caused the corresponding effective doses to be higher than those in adults undergoing similar CT examinations.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. J. Wan, M. Krahn, W. J. Ungar, E. Caku, L. Sung, L. S. Medina, and A. S. Doria
Acute Appendicitis in Young Children: Cost-effectiveness of US versus CT in Diagnosis--A Markov Decision Analytic Model
Radiology, December 19, 2008; (2008) 2502080100.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. Huda, K. M. Ogden, and M. R. Khorasani
Converting Dose-Length Product to Effective Dose at CT
Radiology, September 1, 2008; 248(3): 995 - 1003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
E. L. Nickoloff, Z. F. Lu, A. K. Dutta, and J. C. So
Radiation Dose Descriptors: BERT, COD, DAP, and Other Strange Creatures
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2008; 28(5): 1439 - 1450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. A. Mettler Jr, W. Huda, T. T. Yoshizumi, and M. Mahesh
Effective Doses in Radiology and Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine: A Catalog
Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 254 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. Herzog, D. M. Mulvihill, S. A. Nguyen, G. Savino, B. Schmidt, P. Costello, T. J. Vogl, and U. J. Schoepf
Pediatric Cardiovascular CT Angiography: Radiation Dose Reduction Using Automatic Anatomic Tube Current Modulation
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1232 - 1240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
U.K. Udayasankar, K. Braithwaite, M. Arvaniti, D. Tudorascu, W.C. Small, S. Little, and S. Palasis
Low-Dose Nonenhanced Head CT Protocol for Follow-Up Evaluation of Children with Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt: Reduction of Radiation and Effect on Image Quality
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2008; 29(4): 802 - 806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
W Mazrani, K McHugh, and P J Marsden
The radiation burden of radiological investigations
Arch. Dis. Child., December 1, 2007; 92(12): 1127 - 1131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. M. Heyer, P. S. Mohr, S. P. Lemburg, S. A. Peters, and V. Nicolas
Image Quality and Radiation Exposure at Pulmonary CT Angiography with 100- or 120-kVp Protocol: Prospective Randomized Study
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 577 - 583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. S. Brody, D. P. Frush, W. Huda, R. L. Brent, and and the Section on Radiology
Radiation Risk to Children From Computed Tomography
Pediatrics, September 1, 2007; 120(3): 677 - 682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
K Fujii, T Aoyama, S Koyama, and C Kawaura
Comparative evaluation of organ and effective doses for paediatric patients with those for adults in chest and abdominal CT examinations
Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2007; 80(956): 657 - 667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. Bohy, V. de Maertelaer, A. Roquigny, C. Keyzer, D. Tack, and P. A. Gevenois
Multidetector CT in Patients Suspected of Having Lumbar Disk Herniation: Comparison of Standard-Dose and Simulated Low-Dose Techniques
Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 524 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. Huda and A. Vance
Patient Radiation Doses from Adult and Pediatric CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 540 - 546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. H. Mulkens, S. Daineffe, R. De Wijngaert, P. Bellinck, A. Leonard, G. Smet, and J.-L. Termote
Urinary Stone Disease: Comparison of Standard-Dose and Low-Dose with 4D MDCT Tube Current Modulation
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 553 - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. S. Brody, H. A. W. M. Tiddens, R. G. Castile, H. O. Coxson, P. A. de Jong, J. Goldin, W. Huda, F. R. Long, M. McNitt-Gray, M. Rock, et al.
Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 15, 2005; 172(10): 1246 - 1252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. Tack, P. Bohy, I. Perlot, V. De Maertelaer, O. Alkeilani, S. Sourtzis, and P. A. Gevenois
Suspected Acute Colon Diverticulitis: Imaging with Low-Dose Unenhanced Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 189 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Menke
Comparison of Different Body Size Parameters for Individual Dose Adaptation in Body CT of Adults
Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 565 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. Tack, V. De Maertelaer, W. Petit, P. Scillia, P. Muller, C. Suess, and P. A. Gevenois
Multi-Detector Row CT Pulmonary Angiography: Comparison of Standard-Dose and Simulated Low-Dose Techniques
Radiology, July 1, 2005; 236(1): 318 - 325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
Q Mok, S Negus, C A McLaren, T Rajka, M J Elliott, D J Roebuck, and K McHugh
Computed tomography versus bronchography in the diagnosis and management of tracheobronchomalacia in ventilator dependent infants
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., July 1, 2005; 90(4): F290 - f293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Irie and H. Inoue
Individual Modulation of the Tube Current-Seconds to Achieve Similar Levels of Image Noise in Contrast-Enhanced Abdominal CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5): 1514 - 1518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. D. Nawfel, P. F. Judy, A. R. Schleipman, and S. G. Silverman
Patient Radiation Dose at CT Urography and Conventional Urography
Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 126 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. B. Sigal-Cinqualbre, R. Hennequin, H. T. Abada, X. Chen, and J.-F. Paul
Low-Kilovoltage Multi-Detector Row Chest CT in Adults: Feasibility and Effect on Image Quality and Iodine Dose
Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 169 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
J Pages, N Buls, and M Osteaux
CT doses in children: a multicentre study
Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2003; 76(911): 803 - 811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
T. L. Slovis
Children, Computed Tomography Radiation Dose, and the As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) Concept
Pediatrics, October 1, 2003; 112(4): 971 - 972.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Tack, V. De Maertelaer, and P. A. Gevenois
Dose Reduction in Multidetector CT Using Attenuation-Based Online Tube Current Modulation
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 331 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Tack, S. Sourtzis, I. Delpierre, V. de Maertelaer, and P. A. Gevenois
Low-Dose Unenhanced Multidetector CT of Patients with Suspected Renal Colic
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 305 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A Khursheed, M C Hillier, P C Shrimpton, and B F Wall
Influence of patient age on normalized effective doses calculated for CT examinations
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2002; 75(898): 819 - 830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. T. Winer-Muram, J. M. Boone, H. L. Brown, S. G. Jennings, W. C. Mabie, and G. T. Lombardo
Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnant Patients: Fetal Radiation Dose with Helical CT
Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 487 - 492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. L. Slovis
CT and Computed Radiography: The Pictures Are Great, But Is the Radiation Dose Greater Than Required?
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2002; 179(1): 39 - 41.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. L. Slovis
The ALARA Concept in Pediatric CT: Myth or Reality?
Radiology, April 1, 2002; 223(1): 5 - 6.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S J Golding and P C Shrimpton
Radiation dose in CT: are we meeting the challenge?
Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2002; 75(889): 1 - 4.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
P Aviles Lucas, I A Castellano, D R Dance, and E Vano Carruana
Analysis of surface dose variation in CT procedures
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2001; 74(888): 1128 - 1136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
N. S. Rosen, D. J. Brenner, C. D. Elliston, E. J. Hall, and W. E. Berdon
Taking Care of Children
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2001; 177 (3): 715 - 717.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. L. Nickoloff and P. O. Alderson
Radiation Exposures to Patients from CT: Reality, Public Perception, and Policy
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177(2): 285 - 287.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. J. Brenner, C. D. Elliston, E. J. Hall, and W. E. Berdon
Estimated Risks of Radiation-Induced Fatal Cancer from Pediatric CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 289 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Paterson, D. P. Frush, and L. F. Donnelly
Helical CT of the Body: Are Settings Adjusted for Pediatric Patients?
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 297 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. Huda, E. M. Scalzetti, and G. Levin
Technique Factors and Image Quality as Functions of Patient Weight at Abdominal CT
Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 430 - 435.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Lucaya, J. Piqueras, P. Garcia-Pena, G. Enriquez, M. Garcia-Macias, and J. Sotil
Low-Dose High-Resolution CT of the Chest in Children and Young Adults: Dose, Cooperation, Artifact Incidence, and Image Quality
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 985 - 992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. E. Ware, W. Huda, P. J. Mergo, and A. L. Litwiller
Radiation Effective Doses to Patients Undergoing Abdominal CT Examinations
Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 645 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. M. Boone, T. R. Nelson, K. K. Lindfors, and J. A. Seibert
Dedicated Breast CT: Radiation Dose and Image Quality Evaluation
Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 657 - 667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1997 by the Radiological Society of North America.