Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dachman, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by McGill, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dachman, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by McGill, J.

Radiology, Vol 203, 427-430, Copyright © 1997 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Small simulated polyps in pig colon: sensitivity of CT virtual colography

AH Dachman, J Lieberman, RB Osnis, SY Chen, KR Hoffmann, CT Chen, GM Newmark and J McGill
Department of Radiology, the University of Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

PURPOSE: The authors evaluated computed tomographic (CT) virtual colography for the detection of simulated polyps under ideal conditions, as well as the effects on lesion conspicuity of (a) collimation, (b) table pitch, and (c) orientation of the colon lumen with respect to the gantry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pig colon was resected and cleansed, and polyps with diameters of 3, 7, and 10 mm were created. Each specimen was scanned with collimation of 5 and 7 mm and table pitch of 1.0, 1.6, and 2.0 at angles of 0 degrees, 45 degrees, and 90 degrees to the gantry. The initial two-dimensional (2D) images were reconstructed at 1-mm intervals (2D reconstructions), from which three-dimensional (3D) virtual colography images were generated. Polyp conspicuity on the initial and reconstructed 2D images and the 3D reconstructions was evaluated on a three-point scale: 0 = polyp not depicted, 1 = polyp faintly depicted, and 2 = polyp clearly depicted. RESULTS: The 10-mm-diameter polyp was clearly depicted (grade 2 conspicuity) on every initial and reconstructed 2D image and 3D reconstruction without regard to collimation, table pitch, or angle to the gantry. The 7-mm-diameter polyp was clearly depicted (grade 2 conspicuity) on every initial and reconstructed 2D image, but conspicuity on 3D reconstructions varied as the imaging parameters varied. The 3-mm-diameter polyp was faintly depicted (grade 1 conspicuity) on the initial and reconstructed 2D images and 3D reconstructions, but conspicuity varied on the 3D reconstructions as the imaging parameters varied. CONCLUSION: CT virtual colography helped detection of small mucosal polyps regardless of the angle of the colon lumen to the gantry at which they were obtained.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. H. Park, E. K. Choi, S. S. Lee, J. Y. Woo, S. Y. Chung, Y. J. Kim, J. K. Han, and H. K. Ha
Linear Polyp Measurement at CT Colonography: 3D Endoluminal Measurement with Optimized Surface-rendering Threshold Value and Automated Measurement
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 246(1): 157 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. H. Park, E. K. Choi, S. S. Lee, J.-S. Byeon, J.-Y. Jo, Y. H. Kim, K. H. Lee, H. K. Ha, and J. K. Han
Polyp Measurement Reliability, Accuracy, and Discrepancy: Optical Colonoscopy versus CT Colonography with Pig Colonic Specimens
Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 157 - 164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. A. Taylor, A. Slater, S. Halligan, L. Honeyfield, M. E. Roddie, J. Demeshski, H. Amin, and D. Burling
CT Colonography: Automated Measurement of Colonic Polyps Compared with Manual Techniques--Human in Vitro Study
Radiology, December 1, 2006; 242(1): 120 - 128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Slater, S. A. Taylor, D. Burling, L. Gartner, J. Scarth, and S. Halligan
Colonic polyps: effect of attenuation of tagged fluid and viewing window on conspicuity and measurement--in vitro experiment with porcine colonic specimen.
Radiology, July 1, 2006; 240(1): 101 - 109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. G. Mang, C. Schaefer-Prokop, A. Maier, E. Schober, G. Lechner, and M. Prokop
Detectability of Small and Flat Polyps in MDCT Colonography Using 2D and 3D Imaging Tools: Results from a Phantom Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2005; 185(6): 1582 - 1589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Macari and E. J. Bini
CT Colonography: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going?
Radiology, December 1, 2005; 237(3): 819 - 833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. A. Brink
What Multi-Detector Row CT Parameters Are Best for Detection of Colon Polyps?
Radiology, October 1, 2003; 229(1): 1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. A. Taylor, S. Halligan, C. I. Bartram, P. R. Morgan, I. C. Talbot, N. Fry, B. P. Saunders, K. Khosraviani, and W. Atkin
Multi-Detector Row CT Colonography: Effect of Collimation, Pitch, and Orientation on Polyp Detection in a Human Colectomy Specimen
Radiology, October 1, 2003; 229(1): 109 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Wessling, R. Fischbach, N. Meier, T. Allkemper, J. Klusmeier, K. Ludwig, and W. Heindel
CT Colonography: Protocol Optimization with Multi-Detector Row CT--Study in an Anthropomorphic Colon Phantom
Radiology, September 1, 2003; 228(3): 753 - 759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Yee, N. N. Kumar, R. K. Hung, G. A. Akerkar, P. R. G. Kumar, and S. D. Wall
Comparison of Supine and Prone Scanning Separately and in Combination at CT Colonography
Radiology, March 1, 2003; 226(3): 653 - 661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
H. Yoshida, J. Nappi, P. MacEneaney, D. T. Rubin, and A. H. Dachman
Computer-aided Diagnosis Scheme for Detection of Polyps at CT Colonography
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2002; 22(4): 963 - 979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
N P Power, M D Pryor, A Martin, J Horrocks, A M McLean, and R H Reznek
Optimization of scanning parameters for CT colonography
Br. J. Radiol., May 31, 2002; 75(893): 401 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. T. Ferrucci
Colon Cancer Screening with Virtual Colonoscopy: Promise, Polyps, Politics
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2001; 177(5): 975 - 988.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
Y M Miao, Z Amin, J Healy, P Burn, N Murugan, D Westaby, and T G Allen-Mersh
A prospective single centre study comparing computed tomography pneumocolon against colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal neoplasms
Gut, December 1, 2000; 47(6): 832 - 837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. R. Whiting, E. G. McFarland, and J. A. Brink
Influence of Image Acquisition Parameters on CT Artifacts and Polyp Depiction in Spiral CT Colonography: In Vitro Evaluation
Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 165 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. D. Johnson and A. H. Dachman
CT Colonography: The Next Colon Screening Examination?
Radiology, August 1, 2000; 216(2): 331 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GutHome page
P Pescatore, T Glucker, J Delarive, R Meuli, D Pantoflickova, B Duvoisin, P Schnyder, A L Blum, and G Dorta
Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy)
Gut, July 1, 2000; 47(1): 126 - 130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Macari, A. Milano, M. Lavelle, P. Berman, and A. J. Megibow
Comparison of Time-Efficient CT Colonography with Two-and Three-Dimensional Colonic Evaluation for Detecting Colorectal Polyps
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2000; 174(6): 1543 - 1549.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
H. M. Fenlon, D. P. Nunes, P. C. Schroy, M. A. Barish, P. D. Clarke, and J. T. Ferrucci
A Comparison of Virtual and Conventional Colonoscopy for the Detection of Colorectal Polyps
N. Engl. J. Med., November 11, 1999; 341(20): 1496 - 1503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Karadi, C. F. Beaulieu, R. B. Jeffrey Jr, D. S. Paik, and S. Napel
Display Modes for CT Colonography: Part I. Synthesis and Insertion of Polyps into Patient CT Data
Radiology, July 1, 1999; 212(1): 195 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. F. Beaulieu, R. B. Jeffrey Jr, C. Karadi, D. S. Paik, and S. Napel
Display Modes for CT Colonography: Part II. Blinded Comparison of Axial CT and Virtual Endoscopic and Panoramic Endoscopic Volume-rendered Studies
Radiology, July 1, 1999; 212(1): 203 - 212.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. M. Fenlon, D. B. McAneny, D. P. Nunes, P. D. Clarke, and J. T. Ferrucci
Occlusive Colon Carcinoma: Virtual Colonoscopy in the Preoperative Evaluation of the Proximal Colon
Radiology, February 1, 1999; 210(2): 423 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GutHome page
H M Fenlon, D P Nunes, P D Clarke, and J T Ferrucci
Colorectal neoplasm detection using virtual colonoscopy: a feasibility study
Gut, December 1, 1998; 43(6): 806 - 811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. Yoshida, Y. Masutani, P. MacEneaney, D. T. Rubin, and A. H. Dachman
Computerized Detection of Colonic Polyps at CT Colonography on the Basis of Volumetric Features: Pilot Study
Radiology, February 1, 2002; 222(2): 327 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1997 by the Radiological Society of North America.