Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goergen, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by MacMillan, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goergen, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by MacMillan, J. H.

Radiology, Vol 204, 131-135, Copyright © 1997 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Characteristics of breast carcinomas missed by screening radiologists

SK Goergen, J Evans, GP Cohen and JH MacMillan
Department of Radiology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

PURPOSE: To determine whether breast cancers missed at screening mammography have distinguishing characteristics from those of detected cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The mammograms of 146 women with mammographically identifiable breast cancer were viewed independently by two radiologists who were blinded as to whether the cancer had been missed or detected (group 1 lesions, missed cancers; group 2 lesions, detected cancers) at screening. The mammographic lesions were characterized as to location, size, density, type, and visibility on two views. RESULTS: A significant difference between missed and detected cancers was found for diameter (P = .03), number of views (P < .0017), and density (P = .0007). Stepwise multivariable logistic regression showed that density (P = .01) and the number of views (P = .03) but not diameter (P = .27) were independently significant in distinguishing the groups. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups for lesion type (P = .32 for reader 1 and P = .27 for reader 2) or location (P = .86 for reader 1 and P > .96 for reader 2). CONCLUSION: Missed cancers were statistically significantly lower in density and more often seen on only one of two views than detected cancers.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
H. Singh, S. Sethi, M. Raber, and L. A. Petersen
Errors in Cancer Diagnosis: Current Understanding and Future Directions
J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2007; 25(31): 5009 - 5018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. M. Ko, M. J. Nicholas, J. B. Mendel, and P. J. Slanetz
Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography.
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1483 - 1491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. J. Morton, D. H. Whaley, K. R. Brandt, and K. K. Amrami
Screening Mammograms: Interpretation with Computer-aided Detection--Prospective Evaluation
Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 375 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. Stojadinovic, A. Nissan, Z. Gallimidi, S. Lenington, W. Logan, M. Zuley, A. Yeshaya, M. Shimonov, M. Melloul, S. Fields, et al.
Electrical Impedance Scanning for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer in Young Women: Preliminary Results of a Multicenter Prospective Clinical Trial
J. Clin. Oncol., April 20, 2005; 23(12): 2703 - 2715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. F. Brem, J. W. Hoffmeister, G. Zisman, M. P. DeSimio, and S. K. Rogers
A Computer-Aided Detection System for the Evaluation of Breast Cancer by Mammographic Appearance and Lesion Size
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2005; 184(3): 893 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. B. Kopans
Be Careful to Not Willingly Suspend Disbelief
Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 645 - 647.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. A. Helvie, L. Hadjiiski, E. Makariou, H.-P. Chan, N. Petrick, B. Sahiner, S.-C. B. Lo, M. Freedman, D. Adler, J. Bailey, et al.
Sensitivity of Noncommercial Computer-aided Detection System for Mammographic Breast Cancer Detection: Pilot Clinical Trial
Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 208 - 214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. F. Brem, J. Baum, M. Lechner, S. Kaplan, S. Souders, L. G. Naul, and J. Hoffmeister
Improvement in Sensitivity of Screening Mammography with Computer-Aided Detection: A Multiinstitutional Trial
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2003; 181(3): 687 - 693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. Zheng, L. A. Hardesty, W. R. Poller, J. H. Sumkin, and S. Golla
Mammography with Computer-aided Detection: Reproducibility Assessment—Initial Experience
Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 58 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. S. Majid, E. S. de Paredes, R. D. Doherty, N. R. Sharma, and X. Salvador
Missed Breast Carcinoma: Pitfalls and Pearls
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2003; 23(4): 881 - 895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. C. Yankaskas, M. J. Schell, R. E. Bird, and D. A. Desrochers
Reassessment of Breast Cancers Missed During Routine Screening Mammography: A Community-Based Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2001; 177(3): 535 - 541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. W. Freer and M. J. Ulissey
Screening Mammography with Computer-aided Detection: Prospective Study of 12,860 Patients in a Community Breast Center
Radiology, September 1, 2001; 220(3): 781 - 786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
R. R. Raylman, S. Majewski, A. G. Weisenberger, V. Popov, R. Wojcik, B. Kross, J. S. Schreiman, and H. A. Bishop
Positron Emission Mammography-Guided Breast Biopsy
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2001; 42(6): 960 - 966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. L. Birdwell, D. M. Ikeda, K. F. O’Shaughnessy, and E. A. Sickles
Mammographic Characteristics of 115 Missed Cancers Later Detected with Screening Mammography and the Potential Utility of Computer-aided Detection
Radiology, April 1, 2001; 219(1): 192 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. M. Zonderland, E. G. Coerkamp, J. Hermans, M. J. van de Vijver, and A. E. van Voorthuisen
Diagnosis of Breast Cancer: Contribution of US as an Adjunct to Mammography
Radiology, November 1, 1999; 213(2): 413 - 422.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1997 by the Radiological Society of North America.