Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levine, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levine, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, R. C.

Radiology, Vol 204, 27-31, Copyright © 1997 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT

JA Levine, J Neitlich, M Verga, N Dalrymple and RC Smith
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.

PURPOSE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of plain radiography for the detection of ureteral calculi with use of unenhanced helical computed tomography (CT) as the standard of reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Plain radiographs and helical CT scans of 178 patients with acute flank pain were reviewed retrospectively. Three interpretations of plain radiographs were used: (a) Original reading. This was the report made at the time of the patient's evaluation before the patient underwent CT. (b) Blinded retrospective reading. Each plain radiograph was interpreted without knowledge of the CT findings. (c) Unblinded retrospective reading. The plain radiograph of each patient whose CT scan showed a stone was reviewed with the CT scan. RESULTS: The original reading had a sensitivity of 45% and a specificity of 77% for the detection of ureteral calculi. The blinded retrospective reading had a sensitivity of 59% and a specificity of 71%. The unblinded retrospective reading had a sensitivity of 59% (95% confidence interval: 47%, 70%). CONCLUSION: Plain radiography is of limited value for aiding the diagnosis of ureteral stones. All patients with acute flank pain for whom radiologic imaging is recommended can directly undergo unenhanced helical CT; plain radiographs need not be obtained first.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. J. Park, B. H. Yi, H. K. Lee, Y. H. Kim, G. J. Kim, and H. C. Kim
Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Ureteral Calculi Using Sonography as an Initial Diagnostic Tool: How Can We Improve Diagnostic Accuracy?
J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2008; 27(10): 1441 - 1450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Z. S. Kellow, M. MacInnes, D. Kurzencwyg, S. Rawal, R. Jaffer, B. Kovacina, and L. A. Stein
The Role of Abdominal Radiography in the Evaluation of the Nontrauma Emergency Patient
Radiology, September 1, 2008; 248(3): 887 - 893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
S J Freeman and H Sells
Investigation of loin pain
Imaging, March 1, 2008; 20(1): 38 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. Grosjean, B. Sauer, R. M. Guerra, M. Daudon, A. Blum, J. Felblinger, and J. Hubert
Characterization of Human Renal Stones with MDCT: Advantage of Dual Energy and Limitations Due to Respiratory Motion
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): 720 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Memarsadeghi, C. Schaefer-Prokop, M. Prokop, T. H. Helbich, C. C. Seitz, I. M. Noebauer-Huhmann, and G. Heinz-Peer
Unenhanced MDCT in Patients with Suspected Urinary Stone Disease: Do Coronal Reformations Improve Diagnostic Performance?
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): W60 - W64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. B. MacKersie, M. J. Lane, R. T. Gerhardt, H. A. Claypool, S. Keenan, D. S. Katz, and J. E. Tucker
Nontraumatic Acute Abdominal Pain: Unenhanced Helical CT Compared with Three-View Acute Abdominal Series
Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 114 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
S J Freeman and H Sells
Investigation of loin pain
Imaging, August 1, 2005; 17(1): 19 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Memarsadeghi, G. Heinz-Peer, T. H. Helbich, C. Schaefer-Prokop, G. Kramer, M. Scharitzer, and M. Prokop
Unenhanced Multi-Detector Row CT in Patients Suspected of Having Urinary Stone Disease: Effect of Section Width on Diagnosis
Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 530 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M Noroozian, R H Cohan, E M Caoili, N C Cowan, and J H Ellis
Multislice CT urography: state of the art
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2004; 77(suppl_1): S74 - S86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
O. Catalano, A. Nunziata, F. Altei, and A. Siani
Suspected Ureteral Colic: Primary Helical CT Versus Selective Helical CT After Unenhanced Radiography and Sonography
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2002; 178(2): 379 - 387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. E. Van Beers, S. Dechambre, P. Hulcelle, R. Materne, and J. Jamart
Value of Multislice Helical CT Scans and Maximum-Intensity-Projection Images to Improve Detection of Ureteral Stones at Abdominal Radiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2001; 177(5): 1117 - 1121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
N Raby
The role of CT in acute abdominal pain
Imaging, May 1, 2001; 13(2): 112 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. J. Zagoria, E. G. Khatod, and M. Y. M. Chen
Abdominal Radiography After CT Reveals Urinary Calculi: A Method to Predict Usefulness of Abdominal Radiography on the Basis of Size and CT Attenuation of Calculi
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2001; 176(5): 1117 - 1122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
M C Collins and D J Rosario
Emergency uroradiology
Imaging, April 1, 2001; 13(2): 100 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. C. Saw, J. A. McAteer, A. G. Monga, G. T. Chua, J. E. Lingeman, and J. C. Williams Jr.
Helical CT of Urinary Calculi: Effect of Stone Composition, Stone Size, and Scan Collimation
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2000; 175(2): 329 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Z. Assi, J. F. Platt, I. R. Francis, R. H. Cohan, and M. Korobkin
Sensitivity of CT Scout Radiography and Abdominal Radiography for Revealing Ureteral Calculi on Helical CT: Implications for Radiologic Follow-Up
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2000; 175(2): 333 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. C. Smith and M. Varanelli
Diagnosis and Management of Acute Ureterolithiasis: CT Is Truth
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2000; 175(1): 3 - 6.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. M. Maher, T. A. S. Prasad, J. M. Fitzpatrick, J. Corr, D. H. Williams, J. T. Ennis, and J. G. Murray
Spinal Dysraphism at MR Urography: Initial Experience
Radiology, July 1, 2000; 216(1): 237 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. J. Siegel and R. G. Evens
Advances in the Use of Computed Tomography
JAMA, April 14, 1999; 281(14): 1252 - 1254.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch Emergency Med.Home page
Suspected Ureteral Stones: Do Plain Radiographs Add Value to Helical CT?
Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, September 1, 1997; 1997(901): 17 - 17.
[Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. A. B. Fowler, J. A. Locken, J. H. Duchesne, and M. R. Williamson
US for Detecting Renal Calculi with Nonenhanced CT as a Reference Standard
Radiology, January 1, 2002; 222(1): 109 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1997 by the Radiological Society of North America.