|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 204, 27-31, Copyright © 1997 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
JA Levine, J Neitlich, M Verga, N Dalrymple and RC Smith
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
PURPOSE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of plain radiography for the detection of ureteral calculi with use of unenhanced helical computed tomography (CT) as the standard of reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Plain radiographs and helical CT scans of 178 patients with acute flank pain were reviewed retrospectively. Three interpretations of plain radiographs were used: (a) Original reading. This was the report made at the time of the patient's evaluation before the patient underwent CT. (b) Blinded retrospective reading. Each plain radiograph was interpreted without knowledge of the CT findings. (c) Unblinded retrospective reading. The plain radiograph of each patient whose CT scan showed a stone was reviewed with the CT scan. RESULTS: The original reading had a sensitivity of 45% and a specificity of 77% for the detection of ureteral calculi. The blinded retrospective reading had a sensitivity of 59% and a specificity of 71%. The unblinded retrospective reading had a sensitivity of 59% (95% confidence interval: 47%, 70%). CONCLUSION: Plain radiography is of limited value for aiding the diagnosis of ureteral stones. All patients with acute flank pain for whom radiologic imaging is recommended can directly undergo unenhanced helical CT; plain radiographs need not be obtained first.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. J. Park, B. H. Yi, H. K. Lee, Y. H. Kim, G. J. Kim, and H. C. Kim Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Ureteral Calculi Using Sonography as an Initial Diagnostic Tool: How Can We Improve Diagnostic Accuracy? J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2008; 27(10): 1441 - 1450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. S. Kellow, M. MacInnes, D. Kurzencwyg, S. Rawal, R. Jaffer, B. Kovacina, and L. A. Stein The Role of Abdominal Radiography in the Evaluation of the Nontrauma Emergency Patient Radiology, September 1, 2008; 248(3): 887 - 893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S J Freeman and H Sells Investigation of loin pain Imaging, March 1, 2008; 20(1): 38 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Grosjean, B. Sauer, R. M. Guerra, M. Daudon, A. Blum, J. Felblinger, and J. Hubert Characterization of Human Renal Stones with MDCT: Advantage of Dual Energy and Limitations Due to Respiratory Motion Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): 720 - 728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Memarsadeghi, C. Schaefer-Prokop, M. Prokop, T. H. Helbich, C. C. Seitz, I. M. Noebauer-Huhmann, and G. Heinz-Peer Unenhanced MDCT in Patients with Suspected Urinary Stone Disease: Do Coronal Reformations Improve Diagnostic Performance? Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): W60 - W64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B. MacKersie, M. J. Lane, R. T. Gerhardt, H. A. Claypool, S. Keenan, D. S. Katz, and J. E. Tucker Nontraumatic Acute Abdominal Pain: Unenhanced Helical CT Compared with Three-View Acute Abdominal Series Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 114 - 122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S J Freeman and H Sells Investigation of loin pain Imaging, August 1, 2005; 17(1): 19 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Memarsadeghi, G. Heinz-Peer, T. H. Helbich, C. Schaefer-Prokop, G. Kramer, M. Scharitzer, and M. Prokop Unenhanced Multi-Detector Row CT in Patients Suspected of Having Urinary Stone Disease: Effect of Section Width on Diagnosis Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 530 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Noroozian, R H Cohan, E M Caoili, N C Cowan, and J H Ellis Multislice CT urography: state of the art Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2004; 77(suppl_1): S74 - S86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Catalano, A. Nunziata, F. Altei, and A. Siani Suspected Ureteral Colic: Primary Helical CT Versus Selective Helical CT After Unenhanced Radiography and Sonography Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2002; 178(2): 379 - 387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. E. Van Beers, S. Dechambre, P. Hulcelle, R. Materne, and J. Jamart Value of Multislice Helical CT Scans and Maximum-Intensity-Projection Images to Improve Detection of Ureteral Stones at Abdominal Radiography Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2001; 177(5): 1117 - 1121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N Raby The role of CT in acute abdominal pain Imaging, May 1, 2001; 13(2): 112 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Zagoria, E. G. Khatod, and M. Y. M. Chen Abdominal Radiography After CT Reveals Urinary Calculi: A Method to Predict Usefulness of Abdominal Radiography on the Basis of Size and CT Attenuation of Calculi Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2001; 176(5): 1117 - 1122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M C Collins and D J Rosario Emergency uroradiology Imaging, April 1, 2001; 13(2): 100 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. Saw, J. A. McAteer, A. G. Monga, G. T. Chua, J. E. Lingeman, and J. C. Williams Jr. Helical CT of Urinary Calculi: Effect of Stone Composition, Stone Size, and Scan Collimation Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2000; 175(2): 329 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Assi, J. F. Platt, I. R. Francis, R. H. Cohan, and M. Korobkin Sensitivity of CT Scout Radiography and Abdominal Radiography for Revealing Ureteral Calculi on Helical CT: Implications for Radiologic Follow-Up Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2000; 175(2): 333 - 337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Smith and M. Varanelli Diagnosis and Management of Acute Ureterolithiasis: CT Is Truth Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2000; 175(1): 3 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Maher, T. A. S. Prasad, J. M. Fitzpatrick, J. Corr, D. H. Williams, J. T. Ennis, and J. G. Murray Spinal Dysraphism at MR Urography: Initial Experience Radiology, July 1, 2000; 216(1): 237 - 241. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Siegel and R. G. Evens Advances in the Use of Computed Tomography JAMA, April 14, 1999; 281(14): 1252 - 1254. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Suspected Ureteral Stones: Do Plain Radiographs Add Value to Helical CT? Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, September 1, 1997; 1997(901): 17 - 17. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. B. Fowler, J. A. Locken, J. H. Duchesne, and M. R. Williamson US for Detecting Renal Calculi with Nonenhanced CT as a Reference Standard Radiology, January 1, 2002; 222(1): 109 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |