Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Correction for Lee et al., Radiology 203 (2) 465-470.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Erratum

"CT Depiction of Experimental Liver Tumors: Contrast Enhancement with Hepatocyte-selective Iodinated Triglyceride versus Conventional Techniques." Radiology 1997; 203:465-470.

Page 467, Figure 3, the y-axis title should have read "Mean Attenuation Difference (HU) ± SEM" (instead of "Mean Lesion Attenuation [HU] ± SEM").

Page 468, the images in Figure 4 were not of optimal quality because the blankets on the web press were improperly cleaned before printing.

The images should have appeared as follows:

[See figure in the PDF file]

Figure 4. Triglyceride-enhanced CT compared with conventional CT techniques. Axial images were obtained in a 5-mm-diameter VX2 lesion at (a) unenhanced CT, (b) iohexol-enhanced CT (600 mg I/kg), (c) CTAP (600) mg I/kg), (d) triglyceride-enhanced CT (125 mg I/kg), and (e) dual-contrast-enhanced CT (425 mg I/kg). Note increased conspicuity of bilobate lesion (arrow) on d compared with c, at one-fifth the iodine dose. On b, the lesion is camouflaged by tumor enhancement as a result of the nonspecific biodistribution of the conventional contrast material.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1997 by the Radiological Society of North America.