Radiology, Vol 204, 343-348, Copyright © 1997 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Upper extremity central venous obstruction in hemodialysis patients: treatment with Wallstents

TM Vesely, DM Hovsepian, TK Pilgram, DW Coyne and S Shenoy
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.

PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness of using Wallstents to treat subclavian or brachiocephalic venous obstruction after unsuccessful angioplasty, in patients undergoing hemodialysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dialysis records, radiology reports, and procedural images of 20 hemodialysis patients who underwent Wallstent insertion into a subclavian (n = 11) or brachiocephalic (n = 9) vein were reviewed. Technical success and primary, assisted primary, and cumulative patency rates were calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-three Wallstents were inserted for stenosis (n = 18) or occlusion (n = 2). Technical success was 100%. Eight patients underwent 11 reinterventions to maintain patency of the Wallstent during the follow-up period. Patency rates of the Wallstent were (a) primary at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year: 90%, 67%, 42%, and 25%; (b) assisted primary at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year: 88%, 62%, and 47%; and (c) cumulative at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years: 89%, 64%, 56%, and 22%. Considerable shortening of the stent occurred in five patients. One occurred immediately during the deployment procedure, but four were discovered weeks to months later. No other complications occurred. CONCLUSION: After suboptimal angioplasty, treatment of subclavian and brachiocephalic vein stenoses with a Wallstent can provide continued use of a hemodialysis access. Close clinical surveillance and multiple reinterventions are necessary to maintain Wallstent patency.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Allon Current Management of Vascular Access Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2007; 2(4): 786 - 800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. E. Rodriguez, L. Leon, P. Schalch, N. Labropoulos, M. Borge, and P. G. Kalman Arteriovenous Access: Managing Common Problems Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, June 1, 2005; 17(2): 155 - 166. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. K. Rajan, S. Bunston, S. Misra, R. Pinto, and C. E. Lok Dysfunctional Autogenous Hemodialysis Fistulas: Outcomes after Angioplasty--Are There Clinical Predictors of Patency? Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 508 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Turmel-Rodrigues, P. Bourquelot, A. Raynaud, M. Sapoval, P. Haage, and D. Vorwerk Primary Stent Placement in Hemodialysis-related Central Venous Stenoses: The Dangers of a Potential "Radiologic Dictatorship" Drs Haage and Vorwerk respond: Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 600 - 602. [Full Text]

				P. Haage, D. Vorwerk, W. Piroth, K. Schuermann, and R. W. Guenther Treatment of Hemodialysis-related Central Venous Stenosis or Occlusion: Results of Primary Wallstent Placement and Follow-up in 50 Patients Radiology, July 1, 1999; 212(1): 175 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text]