|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 204, 485-488, Copyright © 1997 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
RJ Jackman, F Burbank, SH Parker, WP Evans 3rd, MC Lechner, TR Richardson, I Tocino and AB Wray
Department of Radiology, Palo Alto Medical Clinic, CA 94301, USA.
PURPOSE: To compare histologic findings of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) at 14-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (hereafter, vacuum-assisted biopsy) and at 14-gauge, automated, large- core breast biopsy (hereafter, large-core biopsy) with findings at histologic examination after surgical biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nonpalpable breast lesions were diagnosed as ADH at histologic examination after vacuum-assisted biopsy in 88 lesions in seven institutions and after large-core biopsy in 55 previously reported lesions. Histologic findings at subsequent surgical biopsy were compared for the presence of carcinoma. RESULTS: On the basis of histologic findings of carcinoma at surgical biopsy, the diagnosis of ADH was not correct in 26 (48%) of 54 lesions sampled at large-core biopsy and in 13 (18%) of 74 lesions sampled at vacuum-assisted biopsy (Fisher exact test, P < .0004). More tissue specimens were obtained at vacuum-assisted biopsy (mean, 15.8 specimens) than at large-core biopsy (mean, 9.7 specimens). Individual specimens were twice as large at vacuum-assisted biopsy (mean, 34 mg) as at large-core biopsy (mean, 17 mg) (previously reported). CONCLUSION: ADH was diagnosed 2.7 times more reliably at vacuum-assisted biopsy than at large-core biopsy (with no increase in complications) with most of the improvement as a result of acquisition of more than 10 specimens per lesion, but carcinoma was sufficiently underestimated with both methods to necessitate surgical biopsy.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. R. Eby, J. E. Ochsner, W. B. DeMartini, K. H. Allison, S. Peacock, and C. D. Lehman Frequency and Upgrade Rates of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Diagnosed at Stereotactic Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy: 9-Versus 11-Gauge Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2009; 192(1): 229 - 234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. R. Eby, J. E. Ochsner, W. B. DeMartini, K. H. Allison, S. Peacock, and C. D. Lehman Is Surgical Excision Necessary for Focal Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Found at Stereotactic Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy? Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2008; 15(11): 3232 - 3238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Jang, N. Cho, W. K. Moon, J. S. Park, M. H. Seong, and I. A. Park Underestimation of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia at Sonographically Guided Core Biopsy of the Breast Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2008; 191(5): 1347 - 1351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V Kumaroswamy, J Liston, and A M Shaaban Vacuum assisted stereotactic guided mammotome biopsies in the management of screen detected microcalcifications: experience of a large breast screening centre J. Clin. Pathol., June 1, 2008; 61(6): 766 - 769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Lourenco, M. B. Mainiero, E. Lazarus, D. Giri, and B. Schepps Stereotactic Breast Biopsy: Comparison of Histologic Underestimation Rates with 11- and 9-Gauge Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): W275 - W279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Sohn, Z. Arthurs, G. Herbert, J. Keylock, J. Perry, M. Eckert, D. Fellabaum, D. Smith, and T. Brown Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia: Improved Accuracy with the 11-Gauge Vacuum-Assisted versus the 14-Gauge Core Biopsy Needle Ann. Surg. Oncol., September 1, 2007; 14(9): 2497 - 2501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Doridot, M. Meunier, C. E. Khoury, C. Nos, A. Vincent-Salomon, B. Sigal-Zafrani, and K. B. Clough Stereotactic Radioguided Surgery by SiteSelect for Subclinical Mammographic Lesions Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2005; 12(2): 181 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. R. Margolin, L. Kaufman, R. P. Jacobs, S. R. Denny, and J. D. Schrumpf Stereotactic Core Breast Biopsy of Malignant Calcifications: Diagnostic Yield of Cores with and Cores without Calcifications on Specimen Radiographs Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 251 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kerlikowske, R. Smith-Bindman, B.-M. Ljung, and D. Grady Evaluation of Abnormal Mammography Results and Palpable Breast Abnormalities Ann Intern Med, August 19, 2003; 139(4): 274 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Winchester, J. R. Bernstein, J. M. Jeske, M. H. Nicholson, E. A. Hahn, R. A. Goldschmidt, W. G. Watkin, S. F. Sener, M. B. Bilimoria, E. Barrera Jr, et al. Upstaging of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia After Vacuum-Assisted 11-Gauge Stereotactic Core Needle Biopsy Arch Surg, June 1, 2003; 138(6): 619 - 623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. E. Philpotts, R. J. Hooley, and C. H. Lee Comparison of Automated Versus Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy Methods for Sonographically Guided Core Biopsy of the Breast Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 347 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Pandelidis, D. Heilman, D. Jones, K. Stough, J. Trapeni, and Y. Suliman Accuracy of 11-Gauge Vacuum-Assisted Core Biopsy of Mammographic Breast Lesions Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2003; 10(1): 43 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Mainiero, I. F. Gareen, C. E. Bird, W. Smith, C. Cobb, and B. Schepps Preferential Use of Sonographically Guided Biopsy to Minimize Patient Discomfort and Procedure Time in a Percutaneous Image-Guided Breast Biopsy Program J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2002; 21(11): 1221 - 1226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Jackman, R. L. Birdwell, and D. M. Ikeda Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia: Can Some Lesions Be Defined as Probably Benign after Stereotactic 11-gauge Vacuum-assisted Biopsy, Eliminating the Recommendation for Surgical Excision? Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 548 - 554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Wunderbaldinger, G. Wolf, K. Turetschek, and T. H. Helbich Comparison of Sitting Versus Prone Position for Stereotactic Large-Core Breast Biopsy in Surgically Proven Lesions Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2002; 178(5): 1221 - 1225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Soo, J. A. Baker, E. L. Rosen, and T. T. Vo Sonographically Guided Biopsy of Suspicious Microcalcifications of the Breast: A Pilot Study Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2002; 178(4): 1007 - 1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Liberman, C. A. Gougoutas, M. F. Zakowski, L. R. LaTrenta, A. F. Abramson, E. A. Morris, and D. D. Dershaw Calcifications Highly Suggestive of Malignancy: Comparison of Breast Biopsy Methods Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2001; 177(1): 165 - 172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Guenin, M. L. R. Darling, D. N. Smith, and S. C. Lester Less Is Not More in Stereotactic Biopsy Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2001; 177(1): 250 - 251. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. F. Brem, J. M. Schoonjans, S. N. Goodman, A. Nolten, F. B. Askin, and O. M. B. Gatewood Nonpalpable Breast Cancer: Percutaneous Diagnosis with 11- and 8-gauge Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Biopsy Devices Radiology, June 1, 2001; 219(3): 793 - 796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Guenin, L. E. Philpotts, and C. H. Lee Is Excision of All Lobular Carcinoma in Situ Really Necessary? Drs Philpotts and Lee respond: Radiology, April 1, 2001; 219(1): 295-a - 297. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Jackman, F. Burbank, S. H. Parker, W. P. Evans III, M. C. Lechner, T. R. Richardson, A. A. Smid, H. B. Borofsky, C. H. Lee, H. M. Goldstein, et al. Stereotactic Breast Biopsy of Nonpalpable Lesions: Determinants of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Underestimation Rates Radiology, February 1, 2001; 218(2): 497 - 502. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Berg, H. E. Mrose, and O. B. Ioffe Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia or Lobular Carcinoma in Situ at Core-Needle Breast Biopsy Radiology, February 1, 2001; 218(2): 503 - 509. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. H. Lee, D. Carter, L. E. Philpotts, M. E. Couce, L. J. Horvath, R. C. Lange, and I. Tocino Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Diagnosed with Stereotactic Core Needle Biopsy: Can Invasion Be Predicted? Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 466 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. R. Darling, D. N. Smith, S. C. Lester, C. Kaelin, D.-L. G. Selland, C. M. Denison, P. J. DiPiro, D. I. Rose, E. Rhei, and J. E. Meyer Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ as Revealed by Large-Core Needle Breast Biopsy: Results of Surgical Excision Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2000; 175(5): 1341 - 1346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Dowlatshahi, M. Fan, V. E. Gould, K. J. Bloom, and A. Ali Stereotactically Guided Laser Therapy of Occult Breast Tumors: Work-in-Progress Report Arch Surg, November 1, 2000; 135(11): 1345 - 1352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. E. Philpotts, C. H. Lee, L. J. Horvath, R. C. Lange, D. Carter, and I. Tocino Underestimation of Breast Cancer with II-Gauge Vacuum Suction Biopsy Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 1047 - 1050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. E. Philpotts, N. A. Shaheen, K. S. Jain, D. Carter, and C. H. Lee Uncommon High-Risk Lesions of the Breast Diagnosed at Stereotactic Core-Needle Biopsy: Clinical Importance Radiology, September 1, 2000; 216(3): 831 - 837. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. E. Burak Jr, K. E. Owens, M. B. Tighe, L. Kemp, S. A. Dinges, C. L. Hitchcock, and J. Olsen Vacuum-Assisted Stereotactic Breast Biopsy: Histologic Underestimation of Malignant Lesions Arch Surg, June 1, 2000; 135(6): 700 - 703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Simon, C. L. Kalbhen, R. A. Cooper, and M. E. Flisak Accuracy and Complication Rates of US-guided Vacuum-assisted Core Breast Biopsy: Initial Results Radiology, June 1, 2000; 215(3): 694 - 697. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. Liberman Percutaneous Imaging-Guided Core Breast Biopsy: State of the Art at the Millennium Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2000; 174(5): 1191 - 1199. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. E. Reynolds Core Needle Biopsy of Challenging Benign Breast Conditions: A Comprehensive Literature Review Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2000; 174(5): 1245 - 1250. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Dennis, S. Parker, T. I. Kaske, A. T. Stavros, and J. Camp Incidental Treatment of Nipple Discharge Caused by Benign Intraductal Papilloma Through Diagnostic Mammotome Biopsy Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2000; 174(5): 1263 - 1268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Meyer, D. N. Smith, S. C. Lester, C. Kaelin, P. J. DiPiro, C. M. Denison, R. L. Christian, S. C. Harvey, D.-L. G. Selland, and S. M. Durfee Large-Core Needle Biopsy of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions JAMA, May 5, 1999; 281(17): 1638 - 1641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Jackman, K. W. Nowels, J. Rodriguez-Soto, F. A. Marzoni Jr, S. I. Finkelstein, and M. J. Shepard Stereotactic, Automated, Large-Core Needle Biopsy of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: False-Negative and Histologic Underestimation Rates after Long-term Follow-up Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 799 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Berg, C. L. Arnoldus, E. Teferra, and M. Bhargavan Biopsy of Amorphous Breast Calcifications: Pathologic Outcome and Yield at Stereotactic Biopsy Radiology, November 1, 2001; 221(2): 495 - 503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |