Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Low, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Sebrechts, C. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Low, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Sebrechts, C. P.

Radiology, Vol 204, 513-520, Copyright © 1997 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Peritoneal tumor: MR imaging with dilute oral barium and intravenous gadolinium-containing contrast agents compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT

RN Low, RM Barone, C Lacey, JS Sigeti, GD Alzate and CP Sebrechts
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Sharp and Children's MRI Center, San Diego, CA 92123, USA.

PURPOSE: To compare fat-suppressed, gadolinium-enhanced, breath-hold magnetic resonance (MR) imaging after administration of dilute oral barium solution with unenhanced MR imaging and computed tomography (CT) in the detection of peritoneal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 24 patients in whom peritoneal tumor was known or suspected, double- contrast MR imaging and CT were performed prospectively. MR imaging included T1-weighted, fast spin-echo T2-weighted, and immediate and delayed gadolinium-enhanced, breath-hold, fast multiplanar sequences with fat saturation. Helical and conventional dynamic CT were performed with intravenously and orally administered contrast media. MR images and CT scans were reviewed independently and prospectively by different pairs of radiologists for presence of peritoneal tumor in 17 anatomic sites. Imaging findings were compared with surgical and histopathologic results. RESULTS: Of the 24 patients, 18 had peritoneal tumor confirmed at surgery. Detection of tumor sites was superior with double-contrast MR images (mean sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, 84%, 87%, and 86%, respectively) compared with CT scans (mean sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, 54%, 91%, and 74%, respectively). Double- contrast MR imaging enabled better detection of carcinomatosis and tumors less than 1 cm in diameter (75%-80%) than CT (22%-33%; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Double-contrast MR imaging demonstrated more peritoneal tumors than CT or unenhanced spin-echo MR imaging.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. N. Low, R. M. Barone, J. M. Gurney, and W. D. Muller
Mucinous Appendiceal Neoplasms: Preoperative MR Staging and Classification Compared with Surgical and Histopathologic Findings
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): 656 - 665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
T. D. Yan, J. Sim, and D. L. Morris
Selection of Patients with Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis for Cytoreductive Surgery and Perioperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2007; 14(6): 1807 - 1817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. H. Miller, N. J. Rini, and A. L. Keppke
MRI of Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): W365 - W374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
M V Pakkal and M Balogun
Imaging of ovarian cancer
Imaging, August 1, 2006; 18(1): 20 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
J. H. Stewart IV, P. Shen, and E. A. Levine
Intraperitoneal Hyperthermic Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Surface Malignancy: Current Status and Future Directions
Ann. Surg. Oncol., October 1, 2005; 12(10): 765 - 777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
P. J. Woodward, K. Hosseinzadeh, and J. S. Saenger
From the Archives of the AFIP: Radiologic Staging of Ovarian Carcinoma with Pathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2004; 24(1): 225 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. Turlakow, H. W. Yeung, A. S. Salmon, H. A. Macapinlac, and S. M. Larson
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: Role of 18F-FDG PET
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2003; 44(9): 1407 - 1412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. E. Hanbidge, D. Lynch, and S. R. Wilson
US of the Peritoneum
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2003; 23(3): 663 - 685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. M. McMahon, E. F. Halpern, C. Fernandez-del Castillo, J. W. Clark, and G. S. Gazelle
Pancreatic Cancer: Cost-Effectiveness of Imaging Technologies for Assessing Resectability
Radiology, October 1, 2001; 221(1): 93 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. S. Fulcher, S. G. O'Sullivan, E. M. Segreti, and B. D. Kavanagh
Recurrent Cervical Carcinoma: Typical and Atypical Manifestations
RadioGraphics, October 1, 1999; 19(90001): 103 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. S. Siegelman and E. K. Outwater
Tissue Characterization in the Female Pelvis by Means of MR Imaging
Radiology, July 1, 1999; 212(1): 5 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. N. Low, F. Saleh, S. Y. Thomas Song, T. A. Shiftan, R. M. Barone, C. G. Lacey, and P. M. Goldfarb
Treated Ovarian Cancer: Comparison of MR Imaging with Serum CA-125 Level and Physical Examination—A Longitudinal Study
Radiology, May 1, 1999; 211(2): 519 - 528.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. N. Low, R. C. Semelka, S. Worawattanakul, G. D. Alzate, and J. S. Sigeti
Extrahepatic Abdominal Imaging in Patients with Malignancy: Comparison of MR Imaging and Helical CT, with Subsequent Surgical Correlation
Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 625 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1997 by the Radiological Society of North America.