Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Outwater, E. K.
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Outwater, E. K.
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, D. G.

Radiology, Vol 205, 103-107, Copyright © 1997 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Lipid in renal clear cell carcinoma: detection on opposed-phase gradient-echo MR images

EK Outwater, M Bhatia, ES Siegelman, MA Burke and DG Mitchell
Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107-5244, USA.

PURPOSE: To determine if comparison of in-phase and opposed-phase gradient-echo magnetic resonance (MR) images enables detection of lipid in renal clear cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective search of MR and pathologic records identified 43 patients with biopsy- proved renal masses who underwent in-phase and opposed-phase MR imaging. Thirty-three patients had renal cell carcinoma (27 with clear cell carcinoma), and 10 patients had other renal tumors. With MR images, a region-of-interest measurement of signal intensity of the renal mass was divided by that of reference tissue. In each patient, a ratio of these region-of-interest measurements on the opposed-phase images to those on the in-phase images was calculated and termed the opposed-phase/in-phase signal intensity ratio (OIR). RESULTS: The mean OIR of clear cell carcinomas was significantly different from that of other renal masses (P < .0002); in 16 (59%) of 27 patients with clear cell carcinoma, the OIR was less than 2 standard deviations below the mean OIR of other masses. In cases of clear cell carcinoma, focal signal intensity on opposed-phase images was less than that on in-phase images. CONCLUSION: On opposed-phase images, some clear cell carcinomas show relative focal and diffuse loss of signal intensity. In renal masses, this signal intensity loss-which is consistent with lipid-does not necessarily indicate angiomyolipoma.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Silverman, G. M. Israel, B. R. Herts, and J. P. Richie
Management of the Incidental Renal Mass
Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 16 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. T. Schindera, B. J. Soher, D. M. Delong, B. M. Dale, and E. M. Merkle
Effect of Echo Time Pair Selection on Quantitative Analysis for Adrenal Tumor Characterization with In-Phase and Opposed-Phase MR Imaging: Initial Experience
Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 140 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
I. Pedrosa, M. R. Sun, M. Spencer, E. M. Genega, A. F. Olumi, W. C. Dewolf, and N. M. Rofsky
MR Imaging of Renal Masses: Correlation with Findings at Surgery and Pathologic Analysis
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2008; 28(4): 985 - 1003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
O. A. Catalano, A. E. Samir, D. V. Sahani, and P. F. Hahn
Pixel Distribution Analysis: Can It be Used to Distinguish Clear Cell Carcinomas from Angiomyolipomas with Minimal Fat?
Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 738 - 746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Dyer, D. J. DiSantis, and B. L. McClennan
Simplified Imaging Approach for Evaluation of the Solid Renal Mass in Adults
Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 331 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Y. Kim, J. K. Kim, N. Kim, and K.-S. Cho
CT Histogram Analysis: Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma without Visible Fat from Renal Cell Carcinoma at CT Imaging
Radiology, December 19, 2007; (2007) 2462061312.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S.-P. Lin, A. J. Bierhals, and J. S. Lewis Jr
Best Cases from the AFIP: Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2007; 27(6): 1801 - 1807.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S R Prasad, V R Narra, R Shah, P A Humphrey, J Jagirdar, J R Catena, N C Dalrymple, and C L Siegel
Segmental disorders of the nephron: histopathological and imaging perspective
Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2007; 80(956): 593 - 602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. G. Silverman, K. J. Mortele, K. Tuncali, M. Jinzaki, and E. S. Cibas
Hyperattenuating Renal Masses: Etiologies, Pathogenesis, and Imaging Evaluation
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2007; 27(4): 1131 - 1143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. A. Rosen and M. D. Schnall
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessing Tumor Vascularity and Vascular Effects of Targeted Therapies in Renal Cell Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2007; 13(2): 770s - 776s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. D. Sydow, M. A. Rosen, and E. S. Siegelman
Intracellular lipid within metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma of the adrenal gland: a potential diagnostic pitfall of chemical shift imaging of the adrenal gland.
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2006; 187(5): W550 - W551.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. R. Prasad, P. A. Humphrey, J. R. Catena, V. R. Narra, J. R. Srigley, A. D. Cortez, N. C. Dalrymple, and K. N. Chintapalli
Common and Uncommon Histologic Subtypes of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Imaging Spectrum with Pathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2006; 26(6): 1795 - 1806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. K. Hussain, T. L. Chenevert, F. J. Londy, V. Gulani, S. D. Swanson, B. J. McKenna, H. D. Appelman, S. Adusumilli, J. K. Greenson, and H. S. Conjeevaram
Hepatic Fat Fraction: MR Imaging for Quantitative Measurement and Display--Early Experience
Radiology, December 1, 2005; 237(3): 1048 - 1055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. M. Israel, N. Hindman, E. Hecht, and G. Krinsky
The Use of Opposed-Phase Chemical Shift MRI in the Diagnosis of Renal Angiomyolipomas
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1868 - 1872.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. K. Kim, S.-Y. Park, J.-H. Shon, and K.-S. Cho
Angiomyolipoma with Minimal Fat: Differentiation from Renal Cell Carcinoma at Biphasic Helical CT
Radiology, March 1, 2004; 230(3): 677 - 684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1997 by the Radiological Society of North America.