|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 205, 103-107, Copyright © 1997 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
EK Outwater, M Bhatia, ES Siegelman, MA Burke and DG Mitchell
Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107-5244, USA.
PURPOSE: To determine if comparison of in-phase and opposed-phase gradient-echo magnetic resonance (MR) images enables detection of lipid in renal clear cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective search of MR and pathologic records identified 43 patients with biopsy- proved renal masses who underwent in-phase and opposed-phase MR imaging. Thirty-three patients had renal cell carcinoma (27 with clear cell carcinoma), and 10 patients had other renal tumors. With MR images, a region-of-interest measurement of signal intensity of the renal mass was divided by that of reference tissue. In each patient, a ratio of these region-of-interest measurements on the opposed-phase images to those on the in-phase images was calculated and termed the opposed-phase/in-phase signal intensity ratio (OIR). RESULTS: The mean OIR of clear cell carcinomas was significantly different from that of other renal masses (P < .0002); in 16 (59%) of 27 patients with clear cell carcinoma, the OIR was less than 2 standard deviations below the mean OIR of other masses. In cases of clear cell carcinoma, focal signal intensity on opposed-phase images was less than that on in-phase images. CONCLUSION: On opposed-phase images, some clear cell carcinomas show relative focal and diffuse loss of signal intensity. In renal masses, this signal intensity loss-which is consistent with lipid-does not necessarily indicate angiomyolipoma.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. G. Silverman, G. M. Israel, B. R. Herts, and J. P. Richie Management of the Incidental Renal Mass Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 16 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Schindera, B. J. Soher, D. M. Delong, B. M. Dale, and E. M. Merkle Effect of Echo Time Pair Selection on Quantitative Analysis for Adrenal Tumor Characterization with In-Phase and Opposed-Phase MR Imaging: Initial Experience Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 140 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Pedrosa, M. R. Sun, M. Spencer, E. M. Genega, A. F. Olumi, W. C. Dewolf, and N. M. Rofsky MR Imaging of Renal Masses: Correlation with Findings at Surgery and Pathologic Analysis RadioGraphics, July 1, 2008; 28(4): 985 - 1003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. A. Catalano, A. E. Samir, D. V. Sahani, and P. F. Hahn Pixel Distribution Analysis: Can It be Used to Distinguish Clear Cell Carcinomas from Angiomyolipomas with Minimal Fat? Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 738 - 746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Dyer, D. J. DiSantis, and B. L. McClennan Simplified Imaging Approach for Evaluation of the Solid Renal Mass in Adults Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 331 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Y. Kim, J. K. Kim, N. Kim, and K.-S. Cho CT Histogram Analysis: Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma without Visible Fat from Renal Cell Carcinoma at CT Imaging Radiology, December 19, 2007; (2007) 2462061312. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S.-P. Lin, A. J. Bierhals, and J. S. Lewis Jr Best Cases from the AFIP: Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma RadioGraphics, November 1, 2007; 27(6): 1801 - 1807. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S R Prasad, V R Narra, R Shah, P A Humphrey, J Jagirdar, J R Catena, N C Dalrymple, and C L Siegel Segmental disorders of the nephron: histopathological and imaging perspective Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2007; 80(956): 593 - 602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Silverman, K. J. Mortele, K. Tuncali, M. Jinzaki, and E. S. Cibas Hyperattenuating Renal Masses: Etiologies, Pathogenesis, and Imaging Evaluation RadioGraphics, July 1, 2007; 27(4): 1131 - 1143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Rosen and M. D. Schnall Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessing Tumor Vascularity and Vascular Effects of Targeted Therapies in Renal Cell Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2007; 13(2): 770s - 776s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D. Sydow, M. A. Rosen, and E. S. Siegelman Intracellular lipid within metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma of the adrenal gland: a potential diagnostic pitfall of chemical shift imaging of the adrenal gland. Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2006; 187(5): W550 - W551. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Prasad, P. A. Humphrey, J. R. Catena, V. R. Narra, J. R. Srigley, A. D. Cortez, N. C. Dalrymple, and K. N. Chintapalli Common and Uncommon Histologic Subtypes of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Imaging Spectrum with Pathologic Correlation RadioGraphics, November 1, 2006; 26(6): 1795 - 1806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. K. Hussain, T. L. Chenevert, F. J. Londy, V. Gulani, S. D. Swanson, B. J. McKenna, H. D. Appelman, S. Adusumilli, J. K. Greenson, and H. S. Conjeevaram Hepatic Fat Fraction: MR Imaging for Quantitative Measurement and Display--Early Experience Radiology, December 1, 2005; 237(3): 1048 - 1055. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Israel, N. Hindman, E. Hecht, and G. Krinsky The Use of Opposed-Phase Chemical Shift MRI in the Diagnosis of Renal Angiomyolipomas Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1868 - 1872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Kim, S.-Y. Park, J.-H. Shon, and K.-S. Cho Angiomyolipoma with Minimal Fat: Differentiation from Renal Cell Carcinoma at Biphasic Helical CT Radiology, March 1, 2004; 230(3): 677 - 684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |