Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Melany, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, B. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Melany, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, B. S.

Radiology, Vol 205, 147-152, Copyright © 1997 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Ability of a phase shift US contrast agent to improve imaging of the main renal arteries

ML Melany, EG Grant, AJ Duerinckx, TM Watts and BS Levine
Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, USA.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of a phase shift contrast agent to improve Doppler sonographic imaging of the main renal arteries in cases of suspected renal artery stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 25 patients in whom renal artery stenosis was suspected, baseline Doppler sonography was performed followed by two studies performed after blinded administration of contrast material or placebo (saline). Each kidney (n = 45) was evaluated for (a) visualization of the main renal artery on a scale of 0-4, (b) presence of accessory renal arteries, and (c) direct Doppler sonographic findings suggestive of renal artery stenosis. Correlative magnetic resonance angiography was performed in 24 patients, and angiograms were obtained in eight kidneys with stenosis at one or both imaging studies. RESULTS: Contrast enhancement was observed in 23 patients. Enhancement was 8-20 minutes. Renal artery visualization scores improved from a mean of 2.56 and 2.71 on baseline and noncontrast scans, respectively, to 3.69 after administration of contrast material. Contrast-enhanced images depicted seven kidneys with accessory renal arteries not seen at other studies. Two of eight cases of stenosis were seen only with contrast-enhanced sonography. CONCLUSION: Use of the phase shift contrast agent appears to enable a reduction in the number of equivocal findings of renal artery stenosis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
H.-Y. Lee and E. G. Grant
Sonography in Renovascular Hypertension
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2002; 21(4): 431 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. D. Qanadli, G. Soulez, E. Therasse, V. Nicolet, S. Turpin, D. Froment, M. Courteau, M.-C. Guertin, and V. L. Oliva
Detection of Renal Artery Stenosis: Prospective Comparison of Captopril-Enhanced Doppler Sonography, Captopril-Enhanced Scintigraphy, and MR Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2001; 177(5): 1123 - 1129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
G. Soulez, V. L. Oliva, S. Turpin, R. Lambert, V. Nicolet, and E. Therasse
Imaging of Renovascular Hypertension: Respective Values of Renal Scintigraphy, Renal Doppler US, and MR Angiography
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2000; 20(5): 1355 - 1368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Claudon, P. F. Plouin, G. M. Baxter, T. Rohban, and D. M. Devos
Renal Arteries in Patients at Risk of Renal Arterial Stenosis: Multicenter Evaluation of the Echo-enhancer SH U 508A at Color and Spectral Doppler US
Radiology, March 1, 2000; 214(3): 739 - 746.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. L. Melany, E. G. Grant, S. Farooki, D. McElroy, and C. Kimme-Smith
Effect of US Contrast Agents on Spectral Velocities: In Vitro Evaluation
Radiology, May 1, 1999; 211(2): 427 - 431.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1997 by the Radiological Society of North America.