Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Federle, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Krugh, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Federle, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Krugh, J.

Radiology, Vol 205, 91-93, Copyright © 1997 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Abdominal trauma: use of oral contrast material for CT is safe

MP Federle, N Yagan, AB Peitzman and J Krugh
Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA 15213, USA.

PURPOSE: To determine the potential risk of aspiration pneumonitis associated with use of oral contrast material in computed tomography (CT) performed for evaluation of abdominal trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 510 consecutive adult patients, a dilute 2.5% solution of diatrizoate meglumine and sodium was administered orally or by means of a nasogastric tube as part of a routine protocol for CT evaluation of acute abdominal trauma. A retrospective review of medical records was performed to determine evidence of aspiration pneumonitis occurring before or after CT. RESULTS: None of the patients had aspiration of contrast material or gastric contents attributable to the CT examination. CONCLUSION: Use of contrast material for stomach and bowel opacification during CT for evaluation of abdominal trauma appears to be safe. Proper preparation and administration of contrast material and control of the patient's airway are essential to ensure the safety of this procedure.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. W. Stuhlfaut, J. A. Soto, B. C. Lucey, A. Ulrich, N. K. Rathlev, P. A. Burke, and E. F. Hirsch
Blunt Abdominal Trauma: Performance of CT without Oral Contrast Material
Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 689 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. A. Ziegler, B. L. Fricke, and L. F. Donnelly
Is Administration of Enteric Contrast Material Safe Before Abdominal CT in Children Who Require Sedation? Experience with Chloral Hydrate and Pentobarbital
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2003; 180(1): 13 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. V. Dizendorf, V. Treyer, G. K. von Schulthess, and T. F. Hany
Application of Oral Contrast Media in Coregistered Positron Emission Tomography--CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 477 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. T. Butela, M. P. Federle, P. J. Chang, F. L. Thaete, M. S. Peterson, C. J. Dorvault, A. K. Hari, S. Soni, B. F. Branstetter, K. J. Paisley, et al.
Performance of CT in Detection of Bowel Injury
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2001; 176(1): 129 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1997 by the Radiological Society of North America.