Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruiz-Cruces, R.
Right arrow Articles by Diez de los Rios, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruiz-Cruces, R.
Right arrow Articles by Diez de los Rios, A.

Radiology, Vol 205, 385-393, Copyright © 1997 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Patient dose in radiologically guided interventional vascular procedures: conventional versus digital systems

R Ruiz-Cruces, M Perez-Martinez, A Martin-Palanca, A Flores, J Cristofol, M Martinez-Morillo and A Diez de los Rios
Department of Radiology and Medical Physics, School of Medicine, University of Malaga, Spain.

PURPOSE: To calculate the difference in the patient radiation dose in radiologically guided interventional vascular procedures between conventional and digital systems and to estimate the effective dose and the energy imparted with the digital system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 318 procedures (in 318 patients) in 15 different examination groups were analyzed. The dose-area product was determined by using a transmission chamber fitted to an x-ray-tube light-beam diaphragm; the effective dose was determined by using software. RESULTS: Urinary and biliary tract procedures showed small differences in the average dose- area product between conventional and digital systems. The dose-area products in the vascular procedures were higher with the digital than with the conventional system. The average effective dose and energy imparted were 0.88 mSv and 129 mJ, respectively, in the subcutaneous placement of a reservoir for analgesic administration and as much as 25.7 mSv and 829 mJ, respectively, in spermatic vein embolization. CONCLUSION: The dose-area product was higher with the digital system than with the conventional system in 13 of the 15 groups. To reduce the patient dose in vascular interventional radiology procedures, the training of personnel and the frequent use of conventional fluoroscopy and low-dose imaging are required.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
A. Mesbahi, P. Mehnati, A. Keshtkar, and N. Aslanabadi
Comparison of radiation dose to patient and staff for two interventional cardiology units: a phantom study
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, September 1, 2008; 131(3): 399 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. A. Mettler Jr, W. Huda, T. T. Yoshizumi, and M. Mahesh
Effective Doses in Radiology and Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine: A Catalog
Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 254 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
D. Bor, S. Cekirge, T. Turkay, O. Turan, M. Gulay, E. Onal, and B. Cil
Patient and staff doses in interventional neuroradiology
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(1-3): 62 - 68.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Chida, H. Saito, M. Zuguchi, K. Shirotori, S. Kumagai, H. Nakayama, K. Matsubara, and M. Kohzuki
Does Digital Acquisition Reduce Patients' Skin Dose in Cardiac Interventional Procedures? An Experimental Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2004; 183(4): 1111 - 1114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
V Tsapaki, S Kottou, N Kollaros, P Dafnomili, M Koutelou, E Vano, and V Neofotistou
Comparison of a conventional and a flat-panel digital system in interventional cardiology procedures
Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2004; 77(919): 562 - 567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
D Bor, T Sancak, T Olgar, Y Elcim, A Adanali, U Sanlidilek, and S Akyar
Comparison of effective doses obtained from dose-area product and air kerma measurements in interventional radiology
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2004; 77(916): 315 - 322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
G J Kemerink, M W de Haan, G B C Vasbinder, M J Frantzen, F W Schultz, J Zoetelief, J T. M Jansen, and J M A van Engelshoven
The effect of equipment set up on patient radiation dose in conventional and CT angiography of the renal arteries
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2003; 76(909): 625 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
N Buls, J Pages, F Mana, and M Osteaux
Patient and staff exposure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
Br. J. Radiol., May 31, 2002; 75(893): 435 - 443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. Mahesh
Fluoroscopy: Patient Radiation Exposure Issues
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2001; 21(4): 1033 - 1045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Chung, D. P. Frush, N. S. Prose, C. R. Shea, T. Laor, and G. S. Bisset
Subcutaneous Granuloma Annulare: MR Imaging Features in Six Children and Literature Review
Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 845 - 849.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1997 by the Radiological Society of North America.