Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morris, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Liberman, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morris, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Liberman, L.

Radiology, Vol 205, 437-440, Copyright © 1997 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

MR imaging of the breast in patients with occult primary breast carcinoma

EA Morris, LH Schwartz, DD Dershaw, KJ van Zee, AF Abramson and L Liberman
Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the breast for localization of the site of primary breast carcinoma in patients with isolated ipsilateral axillary metastasis, without other focal findings at physical examination or mammography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve women with biopsy-proved metastatic adenocarcinoma to axillary lymph nodes and occult primary tumor underwent MR imaging at 1.5 T with a three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo pulse sequence before and after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Enhancing areas were correlated with histopathologic findings at mastectomy (n = 8) or breast-conserving treatment (n = 4). RESULTS: In nine (75%) of the 12 patients, enhancement was seen on MR images that represented the site of the primary tumor at surgery. Eight had focal masses, and one had an area of regional enhancement. Two patients had negative MR findings, and no tumor was found at mastectomy. One patient with regional enhancement on MR images had no corresponding tumor at surgery. CONCLUSION: Breast MR imaging enables identification of the site of primary tumor in most patients suspected of having occult primary breast cancer, and MR findings can influence surgical treatment.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
S. Orel
Who Should Have Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation?
J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 703 - 711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. J. Solin, S. G. Orel, W.-T. Hwang, E. E. Harris, and M. D. Schnall
Relationship of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Outcome After Breast-Conservation Treatment With Radiation for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Carcinoma or Ductal Carcinoma in Situ
J. Clin. Oncol., January 20, 2008; 26(3): 386 - 391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. C. Williams, W. B. DeMartini, S. C. Partridge, S. Peacock, and C. D. Lehman
Breast MR Imaging: Computer-aided Evaluation Program for Discriminating Benign from Malignant Lesions
Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 94 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
K. J. Macura, R. Ouwerkerk, M. A. Jacobs, and D. A. Bluemke
Patterns of Enhancement on Breast MR Images: Interpretation and Imaging Pitfalls
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2006; 26(6): 1719 - 1734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
C. L. Buchanan, E. A. Morris, P. L. Dorn, P. I. Borgen, and K. J. Van Zee
Utility of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Occult Primary Breast Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2005; 12(12): 1045 - 1053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Malich, D. R. Fischer, S. Wurdinger, J. Boettcher, C. Marx, M. Facius, and W. A. Kaiser
Potential MRI Interpretation Model: Differentiation of Benign from Malignant Breast Masses
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 964 - 970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. Stojadinovic, A. Nissan, Z. Gallimidi, S. Lenington, W. Logan, M. Zuley, A. Yeshaya, M. Shimonov, M. Melloul, S. Fields, et al.
Electrical Impedance Scanning for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer in Young Women: Preliminary Results of a Multicenter Prospective Clinical Trial
J. Clin. Oncol., April 20, 2005; 23(12): 2703 - 2715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. K. Shetty and W. S. Carpenter
Sonographic Evaluation of Isolated Abnormal Axillary Lymph Nodes Identified on Mammograms
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2004; 23(1): 63 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. R. LaTrenta, J. H. Menell, E. A. Morris, A. F. Abramson, D. D. Dershaw, and L. Liberman
Breast Lesions Detected with MR Imaging: Utility and Histopathologic Importance of Identification with US
Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 856 - 861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A Rieber, H Schirrmeister, A Gabelmann, K Nuessle, S Reske, R Kreienberg, H J Brambs, and T Kuehn
Pre-operative staging of invasive breast cancer with MR mammography and/or PET: boon or bunk?
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2002; 75(898): 789 - 798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. C. Siegmann, M. Muller-Schimpfle, F. Schick, C. T. Remy, N. Fersis, P. Ruck, C. Gorriz, and C. D. Claussen
MR Imaging--Detected Breast Lesions: Histopathologic Correlation of Lesion Characteristics and Signal Intensity Data
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2002; 178(6): 1403 - 1409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. A. Morris, L. Liberman, D. D. Dershaw, J. B. Kaplan, L. R. LaTrenta, A. F. Abramson, and D. J. Ballon
Preoperative MR Imaging--Guided Needle Localization of Breast Lesions
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2002; 178(5): 1211 - 1220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Orel and M. D. Schnall
MR Imaging of the Breast for the Detection, Diagnosis, and Staging of Breast Cancer
Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 13 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
I.-M. A. Obdeijn, E. M. J. Brouwers-Kuyper, M. M. A. Tilanus-Linthorst, T. Wiggers, and M. Oudkerk
MR Imaging-Guided Sonography Followed by Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology in Occult Carcinoma of the Breast
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2000; 174(4): 1079 - 1084.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. A. Berg and P. L. Gilbreath
Multicentric and Multifocal Cancer: Whole-Breast US in Preoperative Evaluation1
Radiology, January 1, 2000; 214(1): 59 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
U. Fischer, L. Kopka, and E. Grabbe
Breast Carcinoma: Effect of Preoperative Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging on the Therapeutic Approach
Radiology, December 1, 1999; 213(3): 881 - 888.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Orel, S. P. Weinstein, M. D. Schnall, C. A. Reynolds, L. M. Schuchter, D. L. Fraker, and L. J. Solin
Breast MR Imaging in Patients with Axillary Node Metastases and Unknown Primary Malignancy
Radiology, August 1, 1999; 212(2): 543 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. M. Boone, T. R. Nelson, K. K. Lindfors, and J. A. Seibert
Dedicated Breast CT: Radiation Dose and Image Quality Evaluation
Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 657 - 667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1997 by the Radiological Society of North America.