Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Therasse, E.
Right arrow Articles by Cusson, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Therasse, E.
Right arrow Articles by Cusson, J. R.

Radiology, Vol 205, 663-668, Copyright © 1997 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Percutaneous biliary drainage: clinical trial of analgesia with interpleural block

E Therasse, M Choiniere, G Soulez, VL Oliva, P Rousseau, F Fugere, D Boudreault and JR Cusson
Department of Radiology, University of Montreal Medical Center, Quebec, Canada.

PURPOSE: To determine the analgesic efficacy and safety of interpleural block for percutaneous biliary drainage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this double-blind study, 34 age- and sex-matched patients who were to undergo percutaneous biliary drainage because of malignant biliary obstruction were randomly assigned to the true-block group (30 mL 0.5% bupivacaine block) or placebo-block group; all had access to a patient- controlled analgesia (fentanyl) pump. Self medication, pain reports, blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation were monitored during and until 8 hours after drainage. The McGill Pain Questionnaire was administered 1 hour after biliary drainage. RESULTS: Patients in the placebo group self administered statistically significantly more fentanyl than did patients in the true-block group (P = .008). Peak pain scores (10-point scale) and McGill Pain Questionnaire scores were statistically significantly higher for the placebo group patients (P = .017 and P = .001, respectively). There were no differences between groups in terms of blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation. Two patients had pneumothorax caused by the interpleural block. CONCLUSION: Interpleural block was effective in decreasing pain and opioid requirements during and after percutaneous biliary drainage and did not compromise the cardiopulmonary status of the patient. However, the rate of pneumothorax was higher than previously reported.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1997 by the Radiological Society of North America.