Radiology, Vol 205, 701-707, Copyright © 1997 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Visualization of colorectal polyps with spiral CT colography: evaluation of processing parameters with perspective volume rendering

EG McFarland, JA Brink, J Loh, G Wang, V Argiro, DM Balfe, JP Heiken and MW Vannier
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.

PURPOSE: To evaluate two key processing steps for detection of colon polyps with spiral computed tomographic (CT) colography with perspective volume rendering (PVR): image reconstruction and opacity assignment of the attenuation data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Spiral CT was performed in 10 patients with known polyps confirmed at colonoscopy, and detailed quantitative analyses were performed of data obtained in four. First, anatomic fidelity of three-dimensional (3D) images generated from two-dimensional (2D) source images with equal voxel dimensions (87%-90% overlap) was compared with 3D images generated from 2D source images with unequal voxel dimensions (0%-80% overlap). Next, the relative dimensions of colorectal polyps to adjacent structures were evaluated for various opacity threshold settings. Then, step and sigmoidal opacity functions were compared with respect to image smoothness and edge sharpness. RESULTS: PVR images generated after interpolation of image data reconstructed with at least 60% overlap were equivalent in image quality to PVR images generated from source images with equal voxel dimensions. Relative polyp-to- haustral fold dimensions demonstrated substantial distortions with opacity thresholds below -700 HU. The 3D PVR images generated with the sigmoidal opacity function were significantly smoother than those generated with the step opacity function (paired t test, P < .02), with small differences noted in edge sharpness. CONCLUSION: Use of highly overlapping source images (87%-90%) was not necessary to generate 3D PVR images of colorectal polyps. Image artifacts were suppressed with use of an appropriate opacity threshold and a sigmoidal opacity function without substantial loss in edge sharpness.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Rogalla, A. Lembcke, J. C. Ruckert, E. Hein, M. Bollow, N. E. Rogalla, and B. Hamm Spasmolysis at CT Colonography: Butyl Scopolamine versus Glucagon Radiology, July 1, 2005; 236(1): 184 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Iinuma, N. Moriyama, M. Satake, K. Miyakawa, U. Tateishi, N. Uchiyama, T. Akasu, T. Fujii, and T. Kobayashi Vascular Virtual Endoluminal Visualization of Invasive Colorectal Cancer on MDCT Colonography Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2005; 184(4): 1194 - 1198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Yee, N. N. Kumar, R. K. Hung, G. A. Akerkar, P. R. G. Kumar, and S. D. Wall Comparison of Supine and Prone Scanning Separately and in Combination at CT Colonography Radiology, March 1, 2003; 226(3): 653 - 661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. G. McFarland, T. K. Pilgram, J. A. Brink, R. A. McDermott, C. V. Santillan, P. W. Brady, J. P. Heiken, D. M. Balfe, L. B. Weinstock, E. P. Thyssen, et al. CT Colonography: Multiobserver Diagnostic Performance Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 380 - 390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N P Power, M D Pryor, A Martin, J Horrocks, A M McLean, and R H Reznek Optimization of scanning parameters for CT colonography Br. J. Radiol., May 31, 2002; 75(893): 401 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Kondo, M. Kanematsu, Y. Shiratori, K. Itoh, T. Murakami, M. Hori, I. Yasuda, M. Matsuo, H. Nakamura, H. Hoshi, et al. MR Cholangiography with Volume Rendering: Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis in Patients with Choledocholithiasis Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2001; 176(5): 1183 - 1189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. G. McFarland, J. A. Brink, T. K. Pilgram, J. P. Heiken, D. M. Balfe, D. A. Hirselj, L. Weinstock, and B. Littenberg Spiral CT Colonography: Reader Agreement and Diagnostic Performance with Two- and Three-dimensional Image-Display Techniques Radiology, February 1, 2001; 218(2): 375 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				B. R. Whiting, E. G. McFarland, and J. A. Brink Influence of Image Acquisition Parameters on CT Artifacts and Polyp Depiction in Spiral CT Colonography: In Vitro Evaluation Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 165 - 172. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. D. Johnson and A. H. Dachman CT Colonography: The Next Colon Screening Examination? Radiology, August 1, 2000; 216(2): 331 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. M. Summers, C. F. Beaulieu, L. M. Pusanik, J. D. Malley, R. B. Jeffrey Jr, D. I. Glazer, and S. Napel Automated Polyp Detector for CT Colonography: Feasibility Study Radiology, July 1, 2000; 216(1): 284 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				G. W. Stevenson 1998 RSNA Annual Oration in Diagnostic Radiology : Colorectal Cancer Imaging: A Challenge for Radiologists Radiology, March 1, 2000; 214(3): 615 - 621. [Full Text]

				J. A. Brink, G. Wang, and E. G. McFarland Optimal Section Spacing in Single-Detector Helical CT Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 575 - 578. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. Karadi, C. F. Beaulieu, R. B. Jeffrey Jr, D. S. Paik, and S. Napel Display Modes for CT Colonography: Part I. Synthesis and Insertion of Polyps into Patient CT Data Radiology, July 1, 1999; 212(1): 195 - 201. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. F. Beaulieu, R. B. Jeffrey Jr, C. Karadi, D. S. Paik, and S. Napel Display Modes for CT Colonography: Part II. Blinded Comparison of Axial CT and Virtual Endoscopic and Panoramic Endoscopic Volume-rendered Studies Radiology, July 1, 1999; 212(1): 203 - 212. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				H. Yoshida, Y. Masutani, P. MacEneaney, D. T. Rubin, and A. H. Dachman Computerized Detection of Colonic Polyps at CT Colonography on the Basis of Volumetric Features: Pilot Study Radiology, February 1, 2002; 222(2): 327 - 336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]