Radiology, Vol 205, 716-720, Copyright © 1997 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Colorectal cancer: diagnostic potential of CT measurements of hepatic perfusion and implications for contrast enhancement protocols

DA Leggett, BB Kelley, IH Bunce and KA Miles
Centre for Functional Imaging, Wesley Research Institute & Southern X- ray Clinics, Wesley Hospital, Queensland, Australia.

PURPOSE: To assess changes in hepatic perfusion in patients with colorectal cancer with computed tomography (CT), diagnostic potential of CT perfusion measurements, and implications for design of contrast enhancement protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 27 patients with colorectal cancer, arterial and portal perfusion were calculated from temporal changes in attenuation after intravenous administration of contrast material. RESULTS: Arterial perfusion greater than 0.25 mL/min/mL was seen in nine (82%) of the 11 patients with overt metastases versus six (38%) of the 16 patients with no overt metastases (P < .05). Portal perfusion of 0.25 mL/min/mL or less was found in five (46%) of the patients with overt metastases versus three (19%) of the patients with no overt metastases. Follow-up imaging showed progressive metastatic disease in three patients, all of whom had decreased portal perfusion. CONCLUSION: Increased arterial perfusion appears to be an indicator of liver metastases, whereas reduced portal perfusion may indicate progressive disease. Contrast enhancement protocols that are based on experience with normal livers may not be optimal for patients with metastases.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. S. Koh, C. H. Thng, P. S. Lee, S. Hartono, H. Rumpel, B. C. Goh, and S. Bisdas Hepatic Metastases: In Vivo Assessment of Perfusion Parameters at Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging with Dual-Input Two-Compartment Tracer Kinetics Model Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 307 - 320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K Murase, S Miyazaki, and X Yang An efficient method for calculating kinetic parameters in a dual-input single-compartment model Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2007; 80(953): 371 - 375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M J White, R L O'Gorman, E M Charles-Edwards, P A Kane, J B Karani, M O Leach, and J J Totman Parametric mapping of the hepatic perfusion index with gadolinium-enhanced volumetric MRI Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2007; 80(950): 113 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. O. Oktar, C. Yucel, T. Demirogullari, A. Uner, M. Benekli, G. Erbas, and H. Ozdemir Doppler sonographic evaluation of hemodynamic changes in colorectal liver metastases relative to liver size. J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2006; 25(5): 575 - 582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. V. Pandharipande, G. A. Krinsky, H. Rusinek, and V. S. Lee Perfusion Imaging of the Liver: Current Challenges and Future Goals Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 661 - 673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. V. Sahani, S. P. Kalva, L. M. Hamberg, P. F. Hahn, C. G. Willett, S. Saini, P. R. Mueller, and T.-Y. Lee Assessing Tumor Perfusion and Treatment Response in Rectal Cancer with Multisection CT: Initial Observations Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 785 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C Harvey and M Blomley Imaging investigation of liver haemodynamics in patients at risk for hepatic metastatic disease Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2005; 78(926): 103 - 104. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Nakashige, J Horiguchi, A Tamura, T Asahara, F Shimamoto, and K Ito Quantitative measurement of hepatic portal perfusion by multidetector row CT with compensation for respiratory misregistration Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2004; 77(921): 728 - 734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K A Miles and M R Griffiths Perfusion CT: a worthwhile enhancement? Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2003; 76(904): 220 - 231. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M A Fuentes, C J Keith, M Griffiths, G Durbridge, and K A Miles Hepatic haemodynamics: interrelationships between contrast enhancement and perfusion on CT and Doppler perfusion indices Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2002; 75(889): 17 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. S. Kuszyk, F. M. Corl, F. N. Franano, D. A. Bluemke, L. V. Hofmann, B. J. Fortman, and E. K. Fishman Tumor Transport Physiology: Implications for Imaging and Imaging-Guided Therapy Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2001; 177(4): 747 - 753. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Miles, M. R. Griffiths, and M. A. Fuentes Standardized Perfusion Value: Universal CT Contrast Enhancement Scale that Correlates with FDG PET in Lung Nodules Radiology, August 1, 2001; 220(2): 548 - 553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J H Gillard, N M Antoun, N G Burnet, and J D Pickard Reproducibility of quantitative CT perfusion imaging Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2001; 74(882): 552 - 555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Cuenod, I. Leconte, N. Siauve, A. Resten, C. Dromain, B. Poulet, F. Frouin, O. Clément, and G. Frija Early Changes in Liver Perfusion Caused by Occult Metastases in Rats: Detection with Quantitative CT Radiology, February 1, 2001; 218(2): 556 - 561. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. G. Sheiman, K. Reynolds, and V. Raptopoulos Alterations in Hepatic Perfusion Resulting from Splanchnic Venous Luminal Compromise Caused by Pancreatic Carcinoma Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2000; 175(1): 105 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]