Radiology, Vol 205, 749-756, Copyright © 1997 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Carotid artery stents: early and intermediate follow-up with Doppler US

ML Robbin, ME Lockhart, TM Weber, JJ Vitek, JK Smith, J Yadav, A Mathur, SS Iyer and GS Roubin
Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL 35233- 1924, USA.

PURPOSE: To determine whether ultrasound (US) is a sensitive follow-up method after placement of a carotid artery stent for the detection of significant stenosis, occlusion, and other complications at early and intermediate follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Doppler US examinations were performed after stent placement in 170 carotid arteries in 119 patients with angiographic correlation. Prospective diagnostic US criteria for stenosis were peak-systolic velocity greater than 1.25 m/sec, internal carotid artery (ICA) to common carotid artery (CCA) peak-systolic velocity ratio of greater than or equal to 3:1, and intrastent doubling of peak-systolic velocity. Retrospective criteria for stenosis were also applied: peak-systolic velocity greater than 1.7 m/sec, ICA end-diastolic velocity greater than 0.4 m/sec, ICA/CCA peak- systolic velocity ratio greater than 2.0, and ICA/CCA end-diastolic velocity ratio greater than 2.4. RESULTS: Eighty-seven immediate and 83 intermediate (average, 7.3 months) follow-up US examinations were performed. Two stent occlusions were detected. One or more prospective US criteria were abnormal in 26 arteries with a stent. One or more retrospective criteria were positive in 47 arteries. Angiography showed corresponding findings, with only one significant stenosis (63%) in the ICA stents. Moderate collapse of a CCA stent was depicted at US. CONCLUSION: Only one significant recurrent stenosis was detected, and no significant stenoses were missed at US. US successfully depicted carotid artery stent occlusion and a moderate stent collapse. Sensitivity in the detection of intrastent stenosis is promising. Further study to refine US criteria in a study with longer term follow- up is needed owing to the lack of significant recurrent stenosis in the intermediate follow-up group.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Setacci, E. Chisci, F. Setacci, F. Iacoponi, and G. de Donato Grading Carotid Intrastent Restenosis: A 6-Year Follow-Up Study Stroke, April 1, 2008; 39(4): 1189 - 1196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Chauvapun, P. A. Armstrong, and B. L. Johnson The Application of Duplex Surveillance After Carotid Intervention Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, December 1, 2007; 19(4): 362 - 367. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Kantarci, I. Mihmanli, M. S. Albayram, H. Barutca, F. Gulsen, N. Kocer, and C. Islak Follow-up of extracranial vertebral artery stents with Doppler sonography. Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3): 779 - 787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. B. Orbach, B. K. Pramanik, J. Lee, T. S. Maldonado, T. Riles, and R. I. Grossman Carotid Artery Stent Implantation: Evaluation with Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography and Virtual Angioscopy--Initial Experience Radiology, January 1, 2006; 238(1): 309 - 320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Berkefeld, B. Turowski, A. Dietz, H. Lanfermann, M. Sitzer, T. Schmitz-Rixen, H. Steinmetz, and F. E. Zanella Recanalization Results after Carotid Stent Placement AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2002; 23(1): 113 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. P. Morris, E. M. Martin, J. Regan, and G. Braden Intracranial Deployment of Coronary Stents for Symptomatic Atherosclerotic Disease AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 1999; 20(9): 1688 - 1694. [Abstract] [Full Text]