Radiology, Vol 205, 785-790, Copyright © 1997 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Balloon dacryocystoplasty: indications and contraindications

J Berkefeld, J Kirchner, HM Muller, U Fries and J Kollath
Institute of Neuroradiology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

PURPOSE: To define the indications and contraindications for balloon dacryocystoplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-five patients with severe epiphora due to partial (n = 47) or complete (n = 38) obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct (NLD) were treated with balloon dacryocystoplasty (DCP). Steerable micro-guide wires with flexible tips were used. Success rates of DCP were evaluated clinically and dacryocystographically during the acute phase and at 6- and 12-month follow-up. Failures and recurrences were correlated with clinical and dacryocystographic indications for treatment. RESULTS: Recanalization was successful in 35 (92%) of 38 patients with isolated focal stenoses (n = 20) or short-distance occlusions (n = 18) of the NLD. Among all 85 patients, recanalization was successful in 25 patients (66%) with complete and 37 patients (79%) with partial obstructions. In the absence of the main predictors for recurrent obstructions (ie, active inflammation, filling defects due to calculi, long-distance occlusions, and posttraumatic lesions), 12-month patency rates were 89% (17 of 19 focal stenoses) and 94% (15 of 16 focal occlusions). Otherwise, reobstruction rate was 46% (12 of 26 cases). CONCLUSION: Balloon dacryocystoplasty is successful only in select cases. To achieve results comparable to those of operative treatment, the indication should be limited to patients with circumscribed focal stenoses or occlusions of the NLD. Active dacryocystitis, dacryocystolithiasis, and posttraumatic lesions are the main contraindications.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R Ajit, C Inkster, J Tuck, and P Mortzos Orbital emphysema: an unusual complication of balloon dacryocystoplasty Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2004; 77(924): 1057 - 1058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. G. Janssen, K. Mansour, J. J. Bos, and J. A. Castelijns Diameter of the Bony Lacrimal Canal: Normal Values and Values Related to Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: Assessment with CT AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2001; 22(5): 845 - 850. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				E. T. Ilgit, N. Meric, D. Bor, I. Öznur, O. Konus, and S. Isik Lens of the Eye: Radiation Dose in Balloon Dacryocystoplasty Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 54 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. G. Janssen, K. Mansour, J. J. Bos, R. A. Manoliu, and J. A. Castelijns Abscess of the Lacrimal Sac due to Chronic or Subacute Dacryocystitis: Treatment with Temporary Stent Placement in the Nasolacrimal Duct Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 300 - 304. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				G. Y. Ko, D. H. Lee, H.-S. Ahn, H. K. Yoon, K.-B. Sung, and H.-Y. Song Balloon Catheter Dilation in Common Canalicular Obstruction of the Lacrimal System: Safety and Long-term Effectiveness Radiology, March 1, 2000; 214(3): 781 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. L. Weissman Old Problems, New Techniques: The Interventional Radiologist and the Lacrimal Apparatus Radiology, August 1, 1999; 212(2): 305 - 306. [Full Text]

				K. E. Wilhelm, U. Hofer, H. J. Textor, T. Böker, H. M. Strunk, and H. H. Schild Dacryoliths: Nonsurgical Fluoroscopically Guided Treatment during Dacryocystoplasty Radiology, August 1, 1999; 212(2): 365 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				Z. Yazici, B. Yazici, M. Parlak, H. Erturk, and G. Savci Treatment of obstructive epiphora in adults by balloon dacryocystoplasty Br. J. Ophthalmol., June 1, 1999; 83(6): 692 - 696. [Abstract] [Full Text]