Radiology, Vol 205, 853-858, Copyright © 1997 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

The breast: in-plane x-ray protection during diagnostic thoracic CT-- shielding with bismuth radioprotective garments

KD Hopper, SH King, ME Lobell, TR TenHave and JS Weaver
Department of Radiology, Penn State University, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of thin overlying bismuth radioprotective shielding to reduce the x-ray dose to radiosensitive superficial organs during diagnostic computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A variety of patient and phantom studies were performed with four thicknesses of bismuth radioprotective latex over the breast. Dose savings were determined with thermoluminescent dosimeters. A prototype and then a final manufactured radioprotective brassiere was constructed and tested for radiation dose savings to the breast during diagnostic chest CT. Preliminary studies were also performed to evaluate shielding of the thyroid, orbit, and testes. RESULTS: The use of bismuth radioprotective latex saved an average 57% of the radiation dose to the breast from thoracic CT, decreasing the radiation level from an average 2.2 rad (0.022 Gy) to 1.0 rad (0.010 Gy) (P < .001). Preliminary tests of shielding other superficial radiosensitive organs frequently included at diagnostic CT (eyes, thyroid gland, and testes) were performed with the same thickness of overlying bismuth radioprotective latex, with similar results. Radiation to the thyroid gland was reduced by 60% (from 0.0573 to 0.0229 Gy) and radiation to the eye and testes was reduced by 40% (from 0.0256 to 0.0154 Gy) and 51% (from 0.0463 to 0.0229 Gy), respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of in-plane overlying bismuth radioprotective latex manufactured into form-fitting garments did not affect the diagnostic CT image but reduced the amount of radiation to radiosensitive superficial structures.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. R. Mayo Radiation Dose Issues in Longitudinal Studies Involving Computed Tomography Proceedings of the ATS, December 15, 2008; 5(9): 934 - 939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Leswick, M. M. Hunt, S. T. Webster, and D. A. Fladeland Thyroid Shields versus z-Axis Automatic Tube Current Modulation for Dose Reduction at Neck CT Radiology, November 1, 2008; 249(2): 572 - 580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Ngaile, C. B. S. Uiso, P. Msaki, and R. Kazema Use of lead shields for radiation protection of superficial organs in patients undergoing head CT examinations Radiat Prot Dosimetry, July 1, 2008; 130(4): 490 - 498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Siegel Evaluation of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism During Pregnancy JAMA, April 9, 2008; 299(14): 1665 - 1665. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Coursey, D. P. Frush, T. Yoshizumi, G. Toncheva, G. Nguyen, and S. B. Greenberg Pediatric Chest MDCT Using Tube Current Modulation: Effect on Radiation Dose with Breast Shielding Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): W54 - W61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Heyer, P. S. Mohr, S. P. Lemburg, S. A. Peters, and V. Nicolas Image Quality and Radiation Exposure at Pulmonary CT Angiography with 100- or 120-kVp Protocol: Prospective Randomized Study Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 577 - 583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E V Kennedy, G R Iball, and D S Brettle Investigation into the effects of lead shielding for fetal dose reduction in CT pulmonary angiography Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2007; 80(956): 631 - 638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E L Nickoloff and P O Alderson A comparative study of thoracic radiation doses from 64-slice cardiac CT Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2007; 80(955): 537 - 544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Allen, T. Demetriades, and D. J. Brenner Radiation risk overestimated. Radiology, August 1, 2006; 240(2): 613 - 614. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M. Hurwitz, T. T. Yoshizumi, R. E. Reiman, E. K. Paulson, D. P. Frush, G. T. Nguyen, G. I. Toncheva, and P. C. Goodman Radiation dose to the female breast from 16-MDCT body protocols. Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1718 - 1722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Parker, F. K. Hui, M. A. Camacho, J. K. Chung, D. W. Broga, and N. N. Sethi Female Breast Radiation Exposure During CT Pulmonary Angiography Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1228 - 1233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. P. Frush, L. F. Donnelly, and N. S. Rosen Computed Tomography and Radiation Risks: What Pediatric Health Care Providers Should Know Pediatrics, October 1, 2003; 112(4): 951 - 957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. L. Fricke, L. F. Donnelly, D. P. Frush, T. Yoshizumi, V. Varchena, S. A. Poe, and J. Lucaya In-Plane Bismuth Breast Shields for Pediatric CT: Effects on Radiation Dose and Image Quality Using Experimental and Clinical Data Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 407 - 411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. L. Nickoloff and P. O. Alderson Radiation Exposures to Patients from CT: Reality, Public Perception, and Policy Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177(2): 285 - 287. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. D. Hopper, J. D. Neuman, S. H. King, and A. R. Kunselman Radioprotection to the Eye During CT Scanning AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2001; 22(6): 1194 - 1198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Paterson, D. P. Frush, and L. F. Donnelly Helical CT of the Body: Are Settings Adjusted for Pediatric Patients? Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 297 - 301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M Rehani and M. Berry Radiation doses in computed tomography BMJ, March 4, 2000; 320(7235): 593 - 594. [Full Text]

				M. Remy-Jardin and J. Remy Spiral CT Angiography of the Pulmonary Circulation Radiology, September 1, 1999; 212(3): 615 - 636. [Abstract] [Full Text]