| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Radiology, Vol 206, 227-235, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
P Lang, MF Wendland, M Saeed, A Gindele, W Rosenau, A Mathur, CA Gooding and HK Genant
Department of Radiology, Stanford University Hospital, CA 94305-5105, USA.
PURPOSE: To evaluate diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for detecting tumor necrosis in an animal model of osteogenic sarcoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve rats with osteogenic sarcoma underwent T1- weighted unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced spin-echo and diffusion- weighted spin-echo MR imaging. Histologic correlation was performed. Signal intensities, T2 relaxation times, normalized apparent diffusion coefficients, and relative signal intensity increases were calculated. RESULTS: On diffusion-weighted images, necrotic tumor showed low signal intensity (mean normalized apparent diffusion coefficient, 0.46 +/- 0.20 [1 standard deviation]), indicating rapid diffusion of water molecules as a result of loss of membrane integrity, while viable tumor showed high signal intensity (mean normalized apparent diffusion coefficient, 0.16 +/- 0.05; P < .0001). Differences in the T2 relaxation times and relative signal intensity increases between viable and necrotic tumor were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Normalized apparent diffusion coefficients are more accurate in differentiating between viable and necrotic tumor than are T2 relaxation times or relative signal intensity increases on contrast- enhanced images. Signal intensity overlap between viable and necrotic tumor on gadolinium-enhanced images may be caused by the small molecular size of the agent, which permeates the interstitial space freely, thereby also enhancing necrosis. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging depicts differences in diffusion and, ultimately, in membrane integrity between viable and necrotic tumor and may be used to monitor tumor viability during treatment.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. Atassi, A. K. Bangash, A. Bahrani, G. Pizzi, R. J. Lewandowski, R. K. Ryu, K. T. Sato, V. L. Gates, M. F. Mulcahy, L. Kulik, et al. Multimodality Imaging Following 90Y Radioembolization: A Comprehensive Review and Pictorial Essay RadioGraphics, January 1, 2008; 28(1): 81 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. D. King, A. T. Ahuja, D. K. W. Yeung, D. K. Y. Fong, Y. Y. P. Lee, K. I. K. Lei, and G. M. K. Tse Malignant Cervical Lymphadenopathy: Diagnostic Accuracy of Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 806 - 813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A.A.K. A. Razek, A.Y. Kandeel, N. Soliman, H.M. El-shenshawy, Y. Kamel, N. Nada, and A. Denewar Role of Diffusion-Weighted Echo-Planar MR Imaging in Differentiation of Residual or Recurrent Head and Neck Tumors and Posttreatment Changes AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2007; 28(6): 1146 - 1152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D.-M. Koh and D. J. Collins Diffusion-Weighted MRI in the Body: Applications and Challenges in Oncology Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): 1622 - 1635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.-M. Koh, E. Scurr, D. Collins, B. Kanber, A. Norman, M. O. Leach, and J. E. Husband Predicting Response of Colorectal Hepatic Metastasis: Value of Pretreatment Apparent Diffusion Coefficients Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2007; 188(4): 1001 - 1008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. C. Lee, B. A. Moffat, A. F. Schott, R. Layman, S. Ellingworth, R. Juliar, A. P. Khan, M. Helvie, C. R. Meyer, T. L. Chenevert, et al. Prospective Early Response Imaging Biomarker for Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2007; 13(2): 443 - 450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.-Y. Chen, C.-W. Li, Y.-T. Kuo, T.-S. Jaw, D.-K. Wu, J.-C. Jao, J.-S. Hsu, and G.-C. Liu Early Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization: Choline Levels and MR Diffusion Constants--Initial Experience Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 448 - 456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. C. Thoeny, F. De Keyzer, V. Vandecaveye, F. Chen, X. Sun, H. Bosmans, R. Hermans, E. K. Verbeken, C. Boesch, G. Marchal, et al. Effect of Vascular Targeting Agent in Rat Tumor Model: Dynamic Contrast-enhanced versus Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 492 - 499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. C. Thoeny, F. De Keyzer, F. Chen, Y. Ni, W. Landuyt, E. K. Verbeken, H. Bosmans, G. Marchal, and R. Hermans Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging in Monitoring the Effect of a Vascular Targeting Agent on Rhabdomyosarcoma in Rats Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 756 - 764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Maeda, H. Sakuma, S. E. Maier, and K. Takeda Quantitative Assessment of Diffusion Abnormalities in Benign and Malignant Vertebral Compression Fractures by Line Scan Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2003; 181(5): 1203 - 1209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. Brenner, K. H. Bohuslavizki, and J. F. Eary PET Imaging of Osteosarcoma J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2003; 44(6): 930 - 942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Jaramillo, S. A. Connolly, S. Vajapeyam, R. L. Robertson, P. S. Dunning, R. V. Mulkern, A. Hayward, S. E. Maier, and F. Shapiro Normal and Ischemic Epiphysis of the Femur: Diffusion MR Imaging— Study in Piglets Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 825 - 832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. M. Herneth, M. O. Philipp, J. Naude, M. Funovics, R. R. Beichel, R. Bammer, and H. Imhof Vertebral Metastases: Assessment with Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 889 - 894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Wang, S. Takashima, F. Takayama, S. Kawakami, A. Saito, T. Matsushita, M. Momose, and T. Ishiyama Head and Neck Lesions: Characterization with Diffusion-weighted Echo-planar MR Imaging Radiology, September 1, 2001; 220(3): 621 - 630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Baur, A. Huber, B. Ertl-Wagner, R. Durr, S. Zysk, S. Arbogast, M. Deimling, and M. Reiser Diagnostic Value of Increased Diffusion Weighting of a Steady-state Free Precession Sequence for Differentiating Acute Benign Osteoporotic Fractures from Pathologic Vertebral Compression Fractures AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2001; 22(2): 366 - 372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Spuentrup, A. Buecker, G. Adam, J. J. van Vaals, and R. W. Guenther Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging for Differentiation of Benign Fracture Edema and Tumor Infiltration of the Vertebral Body Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 351 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Ward, S. Caruthers, C. Yablon, M. Blake, M. DiMasi, and S. Eustace Analysis of Diffusion Changes in Posttraumatic Bone Marrow Using Navigator-Corrected Diffusion Gradients Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2000; 174(3): 731 - 734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |
